切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

第五届中国出版政府奖音像电子网络出版物奖提名奖

中国科技核心期刊

中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊

中华重症医学电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (02) : 165 -172. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-1537.2019.02.015

所属专题: 文献

重症医学研究

重症医学支持下指导肿瘤患者化疗的评分系统及检验指标的分析
卢微微1, 周坤1, 陈崇翔2, 赵擎宇2,()   
  1. 1. 510060 广州,中山大学肿瘤防治中心医院重症医学科;510080 广州,中山大学中山医学院临床医学系
    2. 510060 广州,中山大学肿瘤防治中心医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-29 出版日期:2019-05-28
  • 通信作者: 赵擎宇
  • 基金资助:
    国家卫生和计划生育委员会专项基金(1311200006402)

Analysis of scoring systems and test rating about chemotherapy for cancer patients supported by critical care medicine

Weiwei Lu1, Kun Zhou1, Chongxiang Chen2, Qingyu Zhao2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Intensive Care Unit, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Clinical Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, china
    2. Department of Intensive Care Unit, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
  • Received:2018-08-29 Published:2019-05-28
  • Corresponding author: Qingyu Zhao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhao Qingyu, Email:
引用本文:

卢微微, 周坤, 陈崇翔, 赵擎宇. 重症医学支持下指导肿瘤患者化疗的评分系统及检验指标的分析[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2019, 05(02): 165-172.

Weiwei Lu, Kun Zhou, Chongxiang Chen, Qingyu Zhao. Analysis of scoring systems and test rating about chemotherapy for cancer patients supported by critical care medicine[J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2019, 05(02): 165-172.

目的

对重症医学支持下指导肿瘤患者化疗的评分系统及检验指标进行分析,为临床选择适合的重症肿瘤患者进行化疗提供依据。

方法

回顾性分析2010年1月至2016年12月在中山大学肿瘤防治中心住院期间因病情加重转入重症医学科(ICU)在重症医学技术支持下进行抗肿瘤化疗以改善肿瘤导致危重病情的44例肿瘤患者的临床资料。依据患者化疗后28 d的预后情况化分为死亡组(24例)、存活组(20例)。搜集患者入ICU后初始的各项肿瘤学评分系统[卡氏评分(KPS)、美国东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评分]及重症医学评分系统[急性生理与慢性健康评估(APACHEⅡ)、序贯器官功能衰竭评估(SOFA)、Logistic器官功能障碍评分(LODS)、多器官功能不全评分(MODS)、国家预警分数(NEWS)、系统炎症反应综合征(SIRS)、快速序贯器官功能衰竭评估(qSOFA)]的相关指标,并计算分值;以及患者化疗前的实验室检验结果、化疗期间的症状及支持手段,采用SPSS 22.0统计软件进行数据分析。

结果

2组患者的肿瘤学评分系统及重症医学评分系统均未见明显统计学差异。化疗后死亡组的需要血管活性药物升压比例、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)以及γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(GGT)均较存活组高,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。而其余指标未见明显统计学差异。将单因素分析后具有统计学意义的检验指标(需要血管活性药物升压比例、ALT、ALP、GGT)纳入多因素Logistic回归分析,发现需要血管活性药物升压比例(OR=12.306,95%CI:1.200~126.175)、ALP水平(OR=1.020,95%CI:1.003~1.039)为预测重症肿瘤患者化疗预后的独立危险因素。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析显示,ALP的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.753,95%CI为0.605~0.901,P<0.05,截点值为86.25,敏感度为83.3%,特异度为70.0%。

结论

进行化疗的重症肿瘤患者中,使用一般的肿瘤学评分系统或者一些重症医学评分系统均未能有效预测重症患者是否适合、可耐受化疗。血液肿瘤患者较实体肿瘤患者的预后存在优势。患者的肝功能相关指标可区分耐受化疗的重症肿瘤患者,而化疗期间是否使用血管活性药物升压、ALP则是判断重症肿瘤患者化疗预后的独立危险因素。

Objective

to analyze the scoring systems and test rating about chemotherapy for cancer patients supported by critical care medicine, hope to provide some clinical basis for the choice of chemotherapy for severe tumors.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 44 patients admitted to ICU and then given chemotherapy in ICU at the Sun Yat-sen University from January 2010 to December 2016. All patients were diagnosed as malignant tumors. According to the change of the patient′s condition after chemotherapy, they were divided into the worsening group (24) and the improvement group (20). The initial oncology scoring systems [Karnofsky (KPS), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)] and intensive medical scoring systems [Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation 2 (APACHEⅡ), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), Logistic organ dysfunoction system (LODS), quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA), multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS), systematic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and National early warning score (NEWS)] were calculated with the relevant indexs; results of different scoring systems, the test results before chemotherapy, the symptoms during chemotherapy and supportive methods during chemotherapy were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 statistical software.

Results

There was no significant difference between various scoring systems. The proportion of using vasoactive drugs to increase blood pressure, ALT, ALP and GGT in provement group were higher than these in worsening group. The differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The proportion of using vasoactive drugs to increase blood pressure, ALT, ALP, GGT were included in multivariate analysis. It was found that ″using vasoactive drugs to increase blood pressure″ (OR=12.306, 95%CI: 1.200-126.175) and ALP (OR=1.020, 95%CI: 1.003-1.039) were independent risk factors for predicting the prognosis of critically ill cancer patients. The area under the curve (AUC) of ALP was 0.753, 95%CI: 0.605-0.901 with 86.25 of cut-off value, 83.3% of sensitivity, and 70.0% of specificity.

Conclusions

In ICU, general scoring system or severe medical scoring system are unable to predict whether severe patients are resistant to chemotherapy or would benef from chemotherapy. The prognosis of patients with hematologic malignancies is better than that of solid tumors. The liver function index of patients can be useful to predict the resistance to chemotherapy patients, ″using vasoactive drugs to increase blood pressure″ and ALP are the independent risk factors for prognosis after chemotherapy.

表1 2组重症化疗的肿瘤患者基线情况比较[例(%)]
表2 2组重症化疗的肿瘤患者肿瘤学评分及重症医学方面评分比较
表3 2组重症化疗的肿瘤患者化疗期间相应症状及支持手段比较[例(%)]
表4 2组重症化疗的肿瘤患者基线实验室指标比较(±s
表5 多因素Logistic回归分析预后的独立危险因素
图1 碱性磷酸酶的受试者工作特征曲线
表6 独立危险因素的ROC曲线
1
Schnipper LE, Smith TJ, Raghavan D, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30(14):1715-1724.
2
Näppä U, Lindqvist O, Rasmussen BH, et al. Palliative chemotherapy during the last month of life [J]. Ann Oncol, 2011, 22(11):2375-2380.
3
O’Brien ME, Borthwick A, Rigg A, et al. Mortality within 30 days of chemotherapy: a clinical governance benchmarking issue for oncology patients [J]. Br J Cancer, 2006, 95(12):1632-1636.
4
Darmon M, Thiery G, Ciroldi M, et al. Intensive care in patients with newly diagnosed malignancies and a need for cancer chemotherapy [J]. Crit Care Med, 2005, 33(11):2488-2493.
5
Benoit DD, Depuydt PO, Vandewoude KH, et al. Outcome in severely ill patients with hematological malignancies who received intravenous chemotherapy in the intensive care unit [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2006, 32(1):93-99.
6
Song JU, Suh GY, Chung MP, et al. Risk factors to predict outcome in critically ill cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in the intensive care unit [J]. Support Care Cancer, 2011, 19(4):491-495.
7
周际昌. 实用肿瘤内科治疗[M]. 北京:北京科学技术出版社,2010.
8
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) [J]. JAMA, 2016, 315(8):801-810.
9
Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aisner DL, et al. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 5.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology [J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2017, 15(4):504-535.
10
Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Balassanian R, et al. Breast Cancer, Version 4.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology [J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2018, 16(3):310-320.
11
Motzer RJ, Jonasch E, Agarwal N, et al. Kidney Cancer, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology [J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2017, 15(6):804-834.
12
Mohler JL, Armstrong AJ, Bahnson RR, et al. Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2016 [J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2016, 14(1):19-30.
13
Spiess PE, Agarwal N, Bangs R, et al. Bladder Cancer, Version 5.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology [J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2017, 15(10):1240-1267.
14
Ajani JA, D’Amico TA, Almhanna K, et al. National comprehensive cancer network. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 1.2015 [J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2015, 13(2):194-227.
15
Ajani JA, D’Amico TA, Almhanna K, et al. Gastric Cancer, Version 3.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology [J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2016, 14(10):1286-1312.
16
Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M, et al. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology [J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2017, 15(8):1028-1061.
17
Emanuel EJ, Young-Xu Y, Levinsky NG, et al. Chemotherapy use among Medicare beneficiaries at the end of life [J]. Ann Intern Med, 2003, 138(8):639-643.
18
Earle CC, Neville BA, Landrum MB, et al. Trends in the aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2004, 22(2):315-321.
19
Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al. Prognosis in acute organ-system failure [J]. Ann Surg, 1985, 202(6):685-693.
20
American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis [J]. Crit Care Med, 1992, 20(6):864-874.
21
Le Gall JR, Klar J, Lemeshow S, et al. The Logistic Organ Dysfunction system. A new way to assess organ dysfunction in the intensive care unit. ICU Scoring Group [J]. JAMA, 1996, 276(10):802-810.
22
钟南山, 刘又宁. 呼吸病学 [M]. 2版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012.
23
Newsome PN, Cramb R, Davison SM, et al. Guidelines on the management of abnormal liver blood tests [J]. Gut, 2018, 67(1):6-19.
24
Yamamoto K, Awogi T, Okuyama K, et al. Nuclear localization of alkaline phosphatase in cultured human cancer cells [J]. Med Electron Microsc, 2003, 36(1):47-51.
25
Aragon G, Younossi AM. When and how to evaluate mildly elevated liver enzymes in apparently healthy patients [J]. Cleve Clin J Med, 2010, 77(3):195-204.
26
Leung TW, Tang AM, Zee B, et al. Construction of the Chinese University Prognostic Index for hepatocellular carcinoma and comparison with the TNM staging system, the Okuda staging system, and the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program staging system: a study based on 926 patients [J]. Cancer, 2002, 94(6):1760-1769.
27
何明媛,李凤虎. 血清碱性磷酸酶及乳酸脱氢酶与Ⅰ~Ⅲ期乳腺癌生存的相关性[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2017, 44(12):816-822.
28
Wei RJ, Li TY, Yang XC, et al. Serum levels of PSA, ALP, ICTP, and BSP in prostate cancer patients and the significance of ROC curve in the diagnosis of prostate cancer bone metastases [J]. Genet Mol Res, 2016, 15(2):1-9.
29
Kim JM, Kwon CH, Joh JW, et al. The effect of alkaline phosphatase and intrahepatic metastases in large hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2013, 11:40.
30
Du WX, Duan SF, Chen JJ, et al. Serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase as a biomarker for osseous metastases in patients with malignant carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Cancer Res Ther, 2014, 10(Suppl):140-143.
31
Wang Z, Lu Y, Qiao D, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic validity of serum bone turnover markers in bone metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients [J]. J Bone Oncol, 2015, 4(3):85-91.
[1] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[2] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[3] 钱龙, 陆晓峰, 王行舟, 杜峻峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 神经系统调控胃肠道肿瘤免疫应答研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 86-89.
[4] 曹长青, 郭新艳, 高源, 张存, 唐海利, 樊东, 杨小军, 张松, 赵华栋. 肿瘤微环境参与介导HER2阳性乳腺癌曲妥珠单抗耐药的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 90-95.
[5] 燕速, 霍博文, 徐惠宁. 4K荧光腹腔镜扩大右半结肠CME+D3根治术及No.206、No.204组淋巴结清扫术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 14-14.
[6] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[7] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[8] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[9] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[10] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[11] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[12] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[13] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[14] 徐军, 姬园园, 陈君平, 王健. 伴菊形团结构的脑膜瘤合并颅骨侵犯一例并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 916-919.
[15] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
阅读次数
全文


摘要