切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

第五届中国出版政府奖音像电子网络出版物奖提名奖

中国科技核心期刊

中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊

中华重症医学电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (02) : 93 -95. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-1537.2019.02.002

所属专题: 重症医学 总编推荐 文献

述评

新时代下脓毒症诊治的未来之路
谢剑锋1, 刘玲1, 杨毅1,()   
  1. 1. 210009 南京,东南大学附属中大医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-25 出版日期:2019-05-28
  • 通信作者: 杨毅
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81671892); 江苏省医学重点学科项目(ZDXKA2016025); 江苏省重点医学人才项目(ZDRCA2016082); 江苏省科技计划项目——社会发展项目(BE2018743)

The future of sepsis diagnosis and treatment in the new era

Jianfeng Xie1, Ling Liu1, Yi Yang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China
  • Received:2019-03-25 Published:2019-05-28
  • Corresponding author: Yi Yang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yang Yi, Email:
引用本文:

谢剑锋, 刘玲, 杨毅. 新时代下脓毒症诊治的未来之路[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2019, 05(02): 93-95.

Jianfeng Xie, Ling Liu, Yi Yang. The future of sepsis diagnosis and treatment in the new era[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2019, 05(02): 93-95.

基于早期诊断的合理治疗是改善脓毒症患者预后的关键,然而目前脓毒症的诊断及治疗存在不同程度的延迟。随着对脓毒症遗传、表观遗传及蛋白水平等各个分子层面机制探索的不断加深以及云计算、大数据及人工智能的飞速发展,有望构建脓毒症诊断和治疗的新体系。

Early appropriate management based on timely diagnosis is crucial for better outcome of patients with sepsis. However, to some extent, the diagnosis and treatment of sepsis usually delay in clinical practice. The deeper understanding the mechanism of sepsis on genetics, epigenetics and protein level and the rapid development of cloud computing, big data and artificial intelligence, contribute to establish a new system for sepsis diagnosis and management.

1
Weng L, Zeng XY, Yin P, et al. Sepsis-related mortality in China: a descriptive analysis [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2018, 44(7):1071-1080.
2
Filbin MR, Lynch J, Gillingham TD, et al. Presenting symptoms independently predict mortality in septic shock: importance of a previously unmeasured confounder [J]. Crit Care Med, 2018, 46(10):1592-1599.
3
Parlato M, Philippart F, Rouquette A, et al. Circulating biomarkers may be unable to detect infection at the early phase of sepsis in ICU patients: the CAPTAIN prospective multicenter cohort study [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2018, 44(7):1061-1070.
4
Shankar-Hari M, Datta D, Wilson J, et al. Early prediction of sepsis using leukocyte surface biomarkers: the ExPRES-sepsis cohort study [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2018, 44(11):1836-1848.
5
McHugh L, Seldon TA, Brandon RA, et al. A molecular host response assay to discriminate between sepsis and infection negative systemic inflammation in critically ill patients discovery and validation in independent cohorts [J]. PLoS Med, 2015, 12(12):e1001916.
6
Miller RR 3rd, Lopansri BK, Burke JP, et al. Validation of a host response assay, SeptiCyte LAB, for discriminating sepsis from SIRS in the ICU [J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2018, 198(7):903-913.
7
Nemati S, Holder A, Razmi F, et al. An interpretable machine learning model for accurate prediction of sepsis in the ICU [J]. Crit Care Med, 2018, 46(4):547-553.
8
Seymour CW, Gesten F, Prescott HC, et al. Time to treatment and mortality during mandated emergency care for sepsis [J]. N Engl J Med, 2017, 376(23):2235-2244
9
Pruinelli L, Westra BL, Yadav P, et al. Delay within the 3-hour Surviving Sepsis Campaign guideline on mortality for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock [J]. Crit Care Med, 2018, 46(4):500-505.
10
Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundle: 2018 update [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2018, 44(6):925-928.
11
Komorowski M, Celi LA, Badawi O, et al. The artificial intelligence clinician learns optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care [J]. Nat Med, 2018, 24(11):1716-1720.
12
Hotchkiss RS, Colston E, Yende S, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibition in sepsis: a phase 1b randomized, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose study of antiprogrammed cell death-ligand 1 (BMS-936559) [J]. Crit Care Med, 2019.doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003685.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[3] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[4] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[5] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗的项目介绍[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 125-125.
[6] 刘柏隆. 女性压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗之手术治疗方案选择[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 126-126.
[7] 李浩, 陈棋帅, 费发珠, 张宁伟, 李元东, 王硕晨, 任宾. 慢性肝病肝纤维化无创诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 863-867.
[8] 谭瑞义. 小细胞骨肉瘤诊断及治疗研究现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 781-784.
[9] 崔军威, 蔡华丽, 胡艺冰, 胡慧. 亚甲蓝联合金属定位夹及定位钩针标记在乳腺癌辅助化疗后评估腋窝转移淋巴结的临床应用价值探究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 625-632.
[10] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
[11] 王子阳, 王宏宾, 刘晓旌. 血清标志物对甲胎蛋白阴性肝细胞癌诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 677-681.
[12] 陈慧, 邹祖鹏, 周田田, 张艺丹, 张海萍. 皮肤镜对头皮红斑性皮肤病辅助鉴别诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 692-698.
[13] 张平骥, 徐钰, 李天水, 庞文翼, 符师宁, 张梦圆. 重症患者镇静治疗现状及期望的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 562-567.
[14] 胡云鹤, 周玉焯, 付瑞瑛, 于凡, 李爱东. CHS-DRG付费制度下GB1分组住院费用影响因素分析与管理策略探讨[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 568-574.
[15] 王昌前, 林婷婷, 宁雨露, 王颖杰, 谭文勇. 光免疫治疗在肿瘤领域的临床应用新进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 575-583.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?