切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

第五届中国出版政府奖音像电子网络出版物奖提名奖

中国科技核心期刊

中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊

中华重症医学电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (04) : 330 -333. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-1537.2019.04.007

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

以呃逆为首发症状的42例Cushing溃疡合并出血患者的回顾性研究
车鹏1, 王雨刚2,(), 王涛宁2   
  1. 1. 712000 陕西省咸阳市第一人民医院神经外科一病区
    2. 712000 陕西省咸阳市第一人民医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-08 出版日期:2019-11-28
  • 通信作者: 王雨刚

Retrospective study on 42 patients of cushing ulcer with bleeding in the first symptom of hiccup

Peng Che1, Yugang Wang2,(), Taoning Wang2   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery Ward 1, the First People′s Hospital of Xianyang City, Xianyang 712000, China
    2. Department of Neurology and ICU, the First People′s Hospital of Xianyang City, Xianyang 712000, China
  • Received:2018-08-08 Published:2019-11-28
  • Corresponding author: Yugang Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Yugang, Email:
引用本文:

车鹏, 王雨刚, 王涛宁. 以呃逆为首发症状的42例Cushing溃疡合并出血患者的回顾性研究[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2019, 05(04): 330-333.

Peng Che, Yugang Wang, Taoning Wang. Retrospective study on 42 patients of cushing ulcer with bleeding in the first symptom of hiccup[J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2019, 05(04): 330-333.

目的

探讨呃逆是否可作为Cushing溃疡合并出血的首发症状值得引起临床重视。

方法

回顾性研究42例以呃逆为首发症状的Cushing溃疡合并出血患者的病历资料,分析呃逆首次出现时间与第1个24 h胃肠减压引流量之间的关系,比较1 h内综合治疗和超过1 h治疗的患者的出血持续时间、血流动力学不稳定发生率、病死率之间的差别。

结果

呃逆首次出现时间与第1个24 h内胃肠减压引流量之间存在相关性(pearson相关系数r=-0.802)。呃逆发生1 h内治疗组较超过1 h治疗组出血持续时间缩短,出现血流动力学不稳定的发生率更低,病死率更低,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。

结论

呃逆首次出现时间与第1个24 h胃肠减压引流量之间存在负相关,在呃逆出现1 h内诊断Cushing溃疡合并出血,及时进行综合治疗对患者更有益。

Objective

To explore whether it is worthy of clinical attention of hiccup can be regarded as the first symptom of Cushing ulcer with bleeding or not.

Methods

A retrospective study of 42 cases with Cushing ulcer and bleeding as the first symptom of hiccup was given to analyze the relationship between the first appearance time of hiccup and the first 24 h gastrointestinal decompression drainage, compare the difference in duration of hemorrhage, incidence of hemodynamic instability, and mortality between patients who received comprehensive therapy within 1 h and those who received more than 1 h of treatment.

Results

There was a correlation between the first appearance of hiccup and the gastrointestinal decompression drainage within the first 24 h (pearson correlation coefficien r=-0.802). The group of intervention within 1 h had shorter duration of bleeding, lower incidence of hemodynamic instability and mortality (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The first moment of hiccup has a negative correlation with gastrointestinal decompression and drainage volume within 24 h, the diagnosis of Cushing ulcer combined with hemorrhage within 1 h of hiccup occurres, and timely comprehensive treatment is more beneficial for patients.

表1 各组Cushing溃疡合并出血患者病例资料的描述
一般资料 1 h内治疗组(21例) 超过1 h治疗组(21例) 对照组(21例)
性别(男/女,例) 13/8 11/10 15/6
年龄(岁,±s 37±13 34±16 38±10
疾病分类(例)      
  重型颅脑损伤 11 11 0
  脑出血 6 6 0
  颅内占位术后 8 8 0
  胃溃疡 0 0 11
  十二指肠溃疡 0 0 6
  复合溃疡 0 0 8
意识状态 昏迷 昏迷 清醒或嗜睡
首发症状 呃逆 呃逆 呃逆
呃逆首次出现时间(d,±s 4.12±1.27 4.44±1.53 2.46±1.53
发病前合并肺部感染(例) 4 5 1
发病前末梢循环状况 良好 良好 良好
发病前皮肤色泽 红润或正常 红润或正常 红润或正常
发病前血常规      
  血红蛋白(男/女,g/L,±s 132±25/124±21 126±25/120±22 130±22/119±18
  红细胞计数(男/女,×1012/L,±s 4.6±0.8/3.8±0.4 4.4±0.8/3.4±0.3 4.5±0.6/3.6±0.2
  血细胞比容(男/女,%,±s 43±6/35±7 42±7/36±5 43±6/35±5
发病后收缩压(mmHg,±s 128±21 118±15 121±17
发病后胃肠减压后引流物颜色 咖啡色或暗红色 咖啡色或暗红色 -
第1个24 h胃肠减压引流量(ml,±s 263±115 255±128 -
发病后粪便潜血实验 阳性 阳性 阴性
发病后血常规      
  血红蛋白(男/女,g/L,±s 108±22/97±19 111±25/101±21 130±20/119±18
  红细胞计数(男/女,×1012/L,±s 4.0±1.2/3.3±0.3 4.1±0.6/3.1±0.2 4.5±0.9/3.6±0.3
  血细胞比容(男/女,%,±s 37±5/32±4 43±6/35±7 41±7/33±5
  发病后当天胃液pH 3.2±0.9 3.4±1.1 1.2±0.5
发病后当天尿素氮(mmol/L,±s 15.5±2.5 16.4±3.1 7.5±2.3
发病后当天随机血糖(mmol/L,±s 8.9±1.9 10.9±1.6 8.3±2.1
出血持续时间(d,±s 4.3±1.6 7.4±2.1 -
表2 2组间Cushing溃疡合并出血患者出血持续时间、血流动力学不稳定发生率以及患者病死率的比较
1
Kemp WJ, Bashir A, Dababneh H, et al. Cushing′s ulcer: further reflections [J]. Asian J Neurosurg, 2015, 10(2): 87-94.
2
Alain BB, Wang YJ. Cushing′s ulcer in traumatic brain injury [J]. Chin J Traumatol, 2008, 11(2): 114-119.
3
殷惠美, 于婷, 于湘友. 多发伤患者发生应激性溃疡相关因素的临床分析 [J/CD]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2016, 2(2): 119-122.
4
Cook DJ, Fuller HD, Guyatt GH, et al. Risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients of Canadian Critical Care Trials Group [J]. N Engl J Med, 1994, 330(6): 377-381.
5
Tuncer H, Yardan T, Akdemir HU, et al. Comparison of four scoring systems for risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding [J]. Pak J Med Sci, 2018, 4(3): 649-654.
6
Shahrami A, Ahmadi S, Safari S. Full and modified glasgow-blatchford bleeding score in predicting the outcome of patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a diagnostic accuracy study [J]. Emerg (Tehran), 2018, 6(1): e31.
7
Liu Q, Li Y, Dong M, et al. Gastrointestinal bleeding is an independent risk factor for poor prognosis in GIST patients [J]. Biomed Res Int, 2017, 2017: 7152406.
8
Geffner ME. Hypopituitarism in childhood [J]. Cancer Control, 2002, 9(3): 212-222.
9
Haddad SH, Arabi YM. Critical care management of severe traumatic brain injury in adults [J]. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2012, 20: 12.
10
Tizabi Y, Aguilera G. Desensitization of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis following prolonged administration of corticotropin-releasing hormone or vasopressin [J]. Neuroendocrinology, 1992, 56(5): 611-618.
11
Walker TG, Salazar GM, Waltman AC. Angiographic evaluation and management of acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2012, 18(11): 1191-1201.
12
Strate LL, Gralnek IM. ACG clinical guideline: management of patients with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2016, 111(5):755.
13
Chan KH, Mann KS. Failure of cimetidine prophylaxis in neurosurgery [J]. Aust N Z J Surg 1989, 59(2): 133-136.
14
Herzig SJ, Rothberg MB, Feinbloom DB, et al. Risk factors for nosocomial gastrointestinal bleeding and use of acid-suppressive medication in non-critically ill patients [J]. J Gen Intern Med, 2013, 28(5): 683-690.
[1] 尹斌, 刘真, 张亚洁, 舒彬, 贾赤宇. miRNA-146a对过氧化氢所致人胃腺癌细胞株AGS氧化应激损伤的影响[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2016, 11(06): 416-421.
[2] 孔欣, 宋宝全, 刘吟, 张剑, 仇惠英, 吴德沛. 异基因造血干细胞移植并发难治性呃逆一例[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 253-255.
[3] 刘壮壮, 汤东, 王道荣. 直肠癌NOSES术后并发复杂并发症一例报告[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 09(04): 418-420.
[4] 张媛媛, 刘心怡, 张黎明, 吴芸, 刘玉兰. 肩肘外科手术后并发上消化道出血的临床分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2018, 06(01): 54-58.
[5] 宋岩, 李静. 针灸治疗卒中后呃逆的临床研究进展[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2022, 11(02): 65-68.
[6] 任雪松, 许军峰. 针刺治疗中风后难治性呃逆验案[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2020, 09(04): 140-140.
[7] 程星, 赵玲艳, 樊小农. 冲脉论治经前期呃逆案[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2020, 09(01): 33-34.
[8] 张雅鑫, 赵晓峰. 针刺配合中药治疗抑郁症验案[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2020, 09(01): 15-16.
[9] 侯献兵, 潘磊, 王启才. "杂合以治"法治疗肺癌化疗后呃逆[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2019, 08(02): 72-74.
[10] 李玉倩, 王重新. 卒中后顽固性呃逆的中医药治疗进展[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2019, 08(01): 22-25.
[11] 王思聪, 段洪涛, 陈静, 赵红. 针药并用治疗中风后呃逆验案[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2018, 07(02): 54-55.
阅读次数
全文


摘要