切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

第五届中国出版政府奖音像电子网络出版物奖提名奖

中国科技核心期刊

中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊

中华重症医学电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (03) : 248 -252. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-1537.2022.03.011

重症医学研究

提高重症医学教学查房满意度的教学模式
徐静媛1, 陈辉1, 谢波1, 刘玲1, 杨毅1,()   
  1. 1. 210009 南京,江苏省重症医学重点实验室 东南大学附属中大医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-01 出版日期:2022-08-28
  • 通信作者: 杨毅
  • 基金资助:
    全国医学教育发展中心医学模拟教育研究项目(2021MNZC18); 南京市卫生科技发展专项资金资助项目教育管理类课题; 东南大学附属中大医院住院医师规范化培训全国重点专业基地开放课题(ZDZYJD-JZ-2022-6); 东南大学附属中大医院临床教学改革研究与实践项目; 东南大学课程思政教育教学改革与研究实践项目

Survey of ICU teaching rounds: secrets to improve learner satisfaction

Jingyuan Xu1, Hui Chen1, Bo Xie1, Ling Liu1, Yi. Yang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China
  • Received:2022-04-01 Published:2022-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Yi. Yang
引用本文:

徐静媛, 陈辉, 谢波, 刘玲, 杨毅. 提高重症医学教学查房满意度的教学模式[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2022, 08(03): 248-252.

Jingyuan Xu, Hui Chen, Bo Xie, Ling Liu, Yi. Yang. Survey of ICU teaching rounds: secrets to improve learner satisfaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2022, 08(03): 248-252.

目的

观察不同教学模式及其引起的学员情绪负荷与教学满意度之间的关系,以求找到教学效果最大满意化的教学模式。

方法

通过对入组受试者发放问卷,包括住培医师、进修医师和医学研究生等进行调查,记录受试者一般情况,并要求其记录在查房过程中体验感最强、最希望加强的教学模式,应用Likert量表对每个项目进行评分。同时,记录查房过程中受试者情绪的变化,并用Russel情感模型进行描述,明确不同教学模式及其引起的情绪负荷对查房满意度的影响。

结果

本研究共收到82名受试者的195份问卷。查房者最常应用的教学模式为基于病理生理学的病情分析和决策制定、基于问题的讨论和反馈、基于临床经验的病情分析和决策制定,占比分别为87.18%、61.54%、55.90%。基于问题的讨论和反馈、基于演讲技巧的病情分析和决策制定、基于循证医学的病情分析和决策制定的频次和程度与受试者对查房的满意度呈显著正相关(r=0.210,P=0.003;r=0.185,P=0.010;r=0.166,P=0.020)。受试者期望加强的教学模式为基于问题的讨论和反馈、基于临床经验的病情分析和决策制定、基于病理生理学的病情分析和决策制定、基于演讲技巧的病情分析和决策制定,占比分别为37.44%、35.38%、27.18%、27.18%。查房时受试者情绪负荷与满意度之间的关系显示,受试者是否感到兴奋与查房满意度呈显著正相关(r=0.244,P=0.001)。

结论

重症医学的教学查房需要通过不同教学模式进行,基于问题的讨论和反馈、基于演讲技巧的病情分析和决策制定、基于循证医学的病情分析和决策制定可以显著提高受试者对查房的满意度。在查房过程中,学员感受到兴奋的情绪可能提高其满意度。

Objective

To examine the different teaching patterns and learners' emotion load to achieve learners satisfaction on rounds.

Methods

Wenjuanxing was used to recruit participants, including residents, visiting doctors, medical postgraduate students. Baseline characteristics of learners were recorded, and learners were asked to share the top three experiences and emotions during the rounding episode, as well as the expectations of further improvement, and responding to each item using a Likert scale. Learners' emotion during rounding were recorded by Russel model, the relationship between teaching patterns and learners' emotion load to achieve learners, satisfaction on rounds was observed.

Results

A total of 195 questionnaires were collected from 82 subjects. The most common teaching models used by ward rounds were pathophysiology-based disease analysis and decision making, problem-based discussion and feedback, and clinical experience-based disease analysis and decision making, accounting for 87.18%, 61.54%, 55.90%, respectively. The frequency and degree of problem-based discussion and feedback, condition analysis and decision making based on presentation skills, and condition analysis and decision making based on evidence-based medicine were significantly positively correlated with the subjects' satisfaction with ward rounds (r=0.210, P=0.003; r=0.185, P=0.010; r=0.166, P=0.020). The subjects expected to strengthen discussion and feedback based on problems, analysis and decision making based on clinical experience, pathophysiology-based disease analysis and decision making, condition analysis and decision making based on presentation skills, the proportions were 37.44%, 35.38%, 27.18%, 27.18%, respectively. The relationship between emotional load and satisfaction during ward rounds showed that whether the subjects felt excited was positively correlated with satisfaction during ward rounds (r=0.244, P=0.001).

Conclusions

Different teaching patterns should be performed in ICU teaching rounds. Problem-based discussion and feedback, interesting and storytelling presentation, evidence-based medicine may significantly improve the learners' satisfaction with emotion of excited.

表1 受试者一般情况统计(82例)
表2 查房医师的教学模式与满意度的关系(195份)
图1 Russel情感模型显示受试者情绪负荷
表3 受试者查房期间情绪负荷与满意度的关系(195份)
1
Churpek MM, Zadravecz FJ, Winslow C, et al. Incidence and prognostic value of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome and organ dysfunctions in ward patients [J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2015, 192(8): 958-964.
2
北京市科委重大项目MODS课题组. 1087例多器官功能障碍综合征临床流行病学调查[J]. 中国危重病急救医学, 2007, 19(1): 2-6.
3
Santhosh L, Brown W, Ferreira J, et al. Practical tips for ICU bedside teaching [J]. Chest, 2018, 154(4): 760-776.
4
Amaral ACKB, Vincent JL, Rose L, et al. An international perspective on the frequency, perception of utility, and quality of interprofessional rounds practices in intensive care units [J]. J Crit Care, 2020, 55: 28-34.
5
Writing Group for the CHECKLIST-ICU Investigators and the Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet), Cavalcanti AB, Bozza FA, et al. Effect of a quality improvement intervention with daily round checklists, goal setting, and clinician prompting on mortality of critically ill patients: a randomized clinical trial [J]. JAMA, 2016, 315(14): 1480-1490.
6
Merritt FW, Noble MN, Prochazka AV, et al. Attending rounds: What do the all-star teachers do? [J]. Med Teach, 2017, 39(1): 100-104.
7
Carlos WG, Kritek PA, Clay AS, et al. Teaching at the bedside. Maximal impact in minimal time [J]. Ann Am Thorac Soc, 2016, 13(4): 545-548.
8
Nesse RM, Ellsworth PC. Evolution, emotions, and emotional disorders [J]. Am Psychol, 2009, 64(2): 129-139.
9
Hayes MM, Chatterjee S, Schwartzstein RM. Critical thinking in critical care: five strategies to improve teaching and learning in the intensive care unit [J]. Ann Am Thorac Soc, 2017, 14(4): 569-575.
10
Kassutto S, Seam N, Carlos WG, et al. Twelve tips for conducting successful interprofessional teaching rounds [J]. Med Teach, 2020, 42(1): 24-29.
11
Bergl PA, Franco RM, Patel JJ, et al. Impact of fellows-as-teachers workshops on teaching rounds: an observational study in an ICU [J]. Crit Care Explor, 2020, 2(10): e0235.
12
Dodek PM, Raboud J. Explicit approach to rounds in an ICU improves communication and satisfaction of providers [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2003, 29(9): 1584-1588.
13
Siddiqui S. 'Think-aloud' protocol for ICU rounds: an assessment of information assimilation and rational thinking among trainees [J]. Med Educ Online, 2014, 19: 25783
14
Segall N, Bennett-Guerrero E. ICU Rounds: "What we've got here is failure to communicate" [J]. Crit Care Med, 2017, 45(2): 366-367.
15
Cao V, Tan LD, Horn F, et al. Patient-centered structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds in the Medical ICU [J]. Crit Care Med, 2018, 46(1): 85-92.
16
Liu JL, Harkness S, Super CM. Chinese mothers' cultural models of children's shyness: ethnotheories and socialization strategies in the context of social change [J]. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev, 2020, 2020(170): 69-92.
17
Balkaya M, Cheah CSL, Yu J, et al. Maternal encouragement of modest behavior, temperamental shyness, and anxious withdrawal linkages to Chinese American children's social adjustment: a moderated mediation analysis [J]. Soc Dev, 2018, 27(4): 876-890.
18
Liu J, Bowker JC, Coplan RJ, et al. Evaluating links among shyness, peer relations, and internalizing problems in Chinese young adolescents [J]. J Res Adolesc, 2019, 29(3): 696-709.
19
Fraser K, Ma I, Teteris E, et al. Emotion, cognitive load and learning outcomes during simulation training [J]. Med Educ, 2012, 46(11): 1055-1062.
20
Fraser K, Huffman J, Ma I, et al. The emotional and cognitive impact of unexpected simulated patient death: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Chest, 2014, 145(5): 958-963.
21
Darke S. Effects of anxiety on inferential reasoning task performance [J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1988, 55(3): 499-505.
22
Sorg BA, Whitney P. The effect of trait anxiety and situational stress on working memory capacity [J]. J Res Pers, 1992, 26(3): 235-241 .
23
Isen AM, Daubman KA, Nowicki GP. Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving [J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1987, 52(6): 1122-1131.
[1] 赵瑞娜, 刘雨佳, 张莉, 姜玉新, 朱庆莉, 杨萌, 李建初. 基于远程教学模式的超声教学查房探索[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(02): 195-199.
[2] 麦苏德·马合木提, 丹尼尔·多里坤, 张海平, 张力为, 伊地力斯·阿吾提. 胸腔镜辅助微创手术(改良型Nuss术)矫正治疗小儿漏斗胸的临床疗效[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(02): 228-233.
[3] 徐舒豪, 杨燃, 邹静, 黄睿洁. 儿童口腔医学教学中健康宣教能力的培养[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 313-317.
[4] 黄海, 蒙建源, 陈福才, 曹玉华, 朱刚健. 免充气腋窝入路腔镜技术与传统方式用于甲状腺次全切除术的对照研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 233-236.
[5] 陈丽茹, 吴小凤, 唐守艳, 吴婵, 邓含, 冯钰. 废液引流俯卧位包的设计及其在经皮肾镜术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 219-222.
[6] 张芝, 孙海云. 舒适护理对老年腹股沟疝患者腹腔镜手术后睡眠质量及满意度的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 488-490.
[7] 金淑溶, 李坤, 刘晨鹏, 潘振宇. 精细化检查流程在盆底疝动态磁共振成像中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 223-226.
[8] 郭娜, 徐立丽, 肖芳, 韩晓静. 综合护理在小儿腹股沟疝围手术期护理中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 358-361.
[9] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[10] 张煜, 孙佐君, 臧二梅. PCMC教学模式在消化医学中心护理实习生医院感染防控带教中的应用效果[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(03): 175-176.
[11] 吴珺, 王会娟, 张欣, 陈琳, 沙玉英, 田明达. 在非临床医学专业医学生中优化儿科教学模式的研究与探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(10): 1024-1026.
[12] 林梅双, 邓聪, 邓小燕, 周强. 线上线下混合教学改革在临床血液学检验实验教学中的应用[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 118-123.
[13] 李新华, 罗依, 袁颖, 黄颖, 徐美华, 吴静. 以学生为中心的线上线下混合式教学改革在交流技能学中的应用[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 217-221.
[14] 马建惠, 文明, 谢芳, 韩琦. 人性化护理在心房颤动合并胃食管反流患者射频消融术中的应用及满意度分析[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 46-49.
[15] 魏盈盈, 潘鑫, 李岑, 曹俊辉, 顾慧, 王忻, 杨声远. 基于胸痛中心急救流程在急性心肌梗死患者救治中的应用[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2022, 08(02): 86-88.
阅读次数
全文


摘要