切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

第五届中国出版政府奖音像电子网络出版物奖提名奖

中国科技核心期刊

中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊

中华重症医学电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (01) : 6 -11. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.jssn.2096-1537.2016.01.003

所属专题: 重症医学 文献

专家论坛

重症心脏与心脏机械辅助装置:现状与未来
孙仁华1,*,*(), 刘景全1   
  1. 1. 310014 杭州,浙江省人民医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2015-02-16 出版日期:2016-02-28
  • 通信作者: 孙仁华

Critical heart disease and mechanical circulatory support

Renhua Sun1(), Jingquan Liu1   

  1. 1. Department of Intensive Care Unit, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou 310014, China
  • Received:2015-02-16 Published:2016-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Renhua Sun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sun Renhua, Email:
引用本文:

孙仁华, 刘景全. 重症心脏与心脏机械辅助装置:现状与未来[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2016, 02(01): 6-11.

Renhua Sun, Jingquan Liu. Critical heart disease and mechanical circulatory support[J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2016, 02(01): 6-11.

机械循环支持(mechanical circulatory support,MCS)已广泛应用于ICU心源性休克及重度心力衰竭患者的救治,为心脏功能恢复的过渡发挥着重要的作用,可纠正患者的血流动力学状态,保障组织灌注,提高生存率。目前,对于MCS应用于重症心脏领域仍有很多值得进一步探索问题,如MCS适应证、应用时机及应用效果等,有待大规模临床研究验证。近年来MCS领域取得了令人欣喜的进步,如小型便携式心脏泵。未来MCS发展方向是体积小、微创、置入和撤离方便、组织相容性好及辅助效果确切。

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) plays an important role in the treatment of cardiogenic shock and heart failure in the ICU. It is able to correct hemodynamic disorders, improve tissue perfusion and increase survival rate. But problems exist in the application of MCS in patients with critical heart disease including its indications, timing and effect, and RCTs are needed. Remarkable achievements have been made in MCS such as the application of small, portable heart pump. In future, MCS would be smaller, minimally invasive, convenient for placement and removal, and have better histocompatibility and auxiliary effectiveness.

[1]
Mebazaa A, Yilmaz MB, Levy P, et al. Recommendations on pre-hospital and early hospital management of acute heart failure: a consensus paper from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, the European Society of Emergency Medicine and the Society of Academic Emergency Medicine--short version[J]. Eur Heart J, 2015, 36(30):1958–1966.
[2]
Levy B, Bastien O, Benjelid K, et al. Experts' recommendations for the management of adult patients with cardiogenic shock[J]. Ann Intensive Care, 2015, 5(1):52.
[3]
Peura JL, Colvin-Adams M, Francis GS, et al. Recommendations for the use of mechanical circulatory support: device strategies and patient selection: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association[J]. Circulation, 2012, 126(22):2648–2667.
[4]
Rihal CS, Naidu SS, Givertz MM, et al. 2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS Clinical Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiovascular Care: Endorsed by the American Heart Assocation, the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologia Intervencion; Affirmation of Value by the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology-Association Canadienne de Cardiologie d'intervention[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2015, 65(19):e7–e26.
[5]
Papaioannou TG, Stefanadis C. Basic principles of the intraaortic balloon pump and mechanisms affecting its performance[J]. Asaio j, 2005, 51(3):296–300.
[6]
Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions[J]. Circulation, 2011, 124(23):e574–651.
[7]
Perera D, Stables R, Thomas M, et al. Elective intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Jama, 2010, 304(8):867–874.
[8]
Perera D, Stables R, Clayton T, et al. Long-term mortality data from the balloon pump-assisted coronary intervention study (BCIS-1): a randomized, controlled trial of elective balloon counterpulsation during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Circulation, 2013, 127(2):207–212.
[9]
Patel MR, Smalling RW, Thiele H, et al. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation and infarct size in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction without shock: the CRISP AMI randomized trial[J]. Jama, 2011, 306(12):1329–1337.
[10]
Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, et al. ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery)[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004, 44(5):e213–310.
[11]
O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2013, 61(4):e78–140.
[12]
中华医学会心血管病学分会. 急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2015, 43(5):380–393.
[13]
Thiele H, Schuler G, Neumann FJ, et al. Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: design and rationale of the Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock Ⅱ (IABP-SHOCK Ⅱ) trial[J]. Am Heart J, 2012, 163(6):938–945.
[14]
Negi SI, Kar B, Gregoric I, et al. Supporting the failing myocardium: is intra-aortic balloon pump enough? The IABP-SHOCK Ⅱ trial[J]. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther, 2013, 11(2):147–149.
[15]
Khashan MY, Pinsky MR. Does intra-aortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock improve outcome[J]? Crit Care, 2013, 17(2):307.
[16]
Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCKⅡ): final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial[J]. Lancet, 2013, 382(9905):1638–1645.
[17]
Romeo F, Acconcia MC, Sergi D, et al. The outcome of intra-aortic balloon pump support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock according to the type of revascularization: a comprehensive meta-analysis[J]. Am Heart J, 2013, 165(5):679–692.
[18]
Unverzagt S, Buerke M, de Waha A, et al. Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015, 3:Cd007398.
[19]
Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO):Guidelines for Adult Cardiac Failure 2013 [EB/OL].

URL    
[20]
Thiagarajan RR, Brogan TV, Scheurer MA, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to support cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2009, 87(3):778–785.
[21]
Nichol G, Karmy-Jones R, Salerno C, et al. Systematic review of percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock states[J]. Resuscitation, 2006, 70(3):381–394.
[22]
Takayama H, Truby L, Koekort M, et al. Clinical outcome of mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock in the current era[J]. J Heart Lung Transplant, 2013, 32(1):106–111.
[23]
Cheng R, Hachamovitch R, Kittleson M, et al. Complications of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for treatment of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis of 1, 866 adult patients[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2014, 97(2):610–616.
[24]
Xie A, Phan K, Tsai YC, et al. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2015, 29(3):637–645.
[25]
Alli OO, Singh IM, Holmes DR, et al. Percutaneous left ventricular assist device with TandemHeart for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the Mayo Clinic experience[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2012, 80(5):728–734.
[26]
Kar B, Gregoric ID, Basra SS, et al. The percutaneous ventricular assist device in severe refractory cardiogenic shock[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2011, 57(6):688–696.
[27]
Burkhoff D CH, Brunckhorst C, et al. A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock[J]. Am Heart J, 2006, 152(3):469.e461–468.
[28]
Seyfarth M, Sibbing D, Bauer I, et al. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008, 52(19):1584–1588.
[29]
Maini B, Naidu SS, Mulukutla S, et al. Real-world use of the Impella 2.5 circulatory support system in complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the USpella Registry[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2012, 80(5):717–725.
[30]
O'Neill WW, Kleiman NS, Moses J, et al. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT Ⅱ study[J]. Circulation, 2012, 126(14):1717–1727.
[31]
Doll N, Kiaii B, Borger M, et al. Five-year results of 219 consecutive patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory postoperative cardiogenic shock[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2004, 77(1):151–157.
[1] 李颖, 潘绍卿, 丁明岩, 孙丹丹, 曲海波, 侯培培, 朱芳. 实时三维超声心动图对高度房室传导阻滞伴射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者左束支区域起搏后左心室功能及同步性的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(04): 430-436.
[2] 作者. 脓毒症与脓毒性休克[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 0-.
[3] 中华医学会烧伤外科学分会小儿烧伤学组. 儿童烧伤早期休克液体复苏专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 371-376.
[4] 龚茂迪, 李涛, 陈伟, 徐述雄. 一例长期口服糖皮质激素患者在经皮肾镜碎石取石术后反复发热的管理经验[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 284-287.
[5] 康慧方, 孙莉, 田应选, 尚文丽, 刘凌华, 霍树芬. HSP90α在老年恶性胸腔积液中的诊断意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 257-259.
[6] 方可, 笪欢欢, 汪君, 孙瑞祥, 王涛, 李阳, 江海娇, 鲁卫华. ECMO联合肾上腺切除救治妊娠期嗜铬细胞瘤并儿茶酚胺心肌病一例并文献回顾[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 304-310.
[7] 蔡荇, 张文娟, 於江泉, 郑瑞强. 血浆肝素结合蛋白在脓毒症早期诊断和预后预测中的应用[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 168-177.
[8] 崔广清, 葛玲玉. PiCCO指导心功能不全合并脓毒症休克患者精准救治的效果[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 185-190.
[9] 王震, 杨晓月, 苏康康, 王朝阳, 李少杰, 陈淑霞, 谷剑. β受体阻滞剂对心力衰竭合并房颤患者预后影响的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 479-482.
[10] 周洋, 曹学, 赵飞, 郑波, 查惠娟, 蒋娜, 罗俊, 熊伟. 血清miR-22、HSPB1水平与急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者预后的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 243-248.
[11] 孔祥增, 李艳敏, 孟莉, 刘娜, 邱会卿, 王晓. S100β、缺血修饰白蛋白、热休克蛋白70在脑小血管病认知功能损害中的表达及相关性研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 58-62.
[12] 杨旭希, 郑吉洋, 陈秀梅, 陈淑玲, 杨峻青, 苏芝琪, 左咏臻, 广东省医师协会心力衰竭专业医师分会, 广东省护士协会介入护士分会. 慢性心力衰竭患者容量管理护理专家共识[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 201-207.
[13] 孔倩文, 刘姗, 曾彩虹, 曾庆春. 有氧运动和抗阻运动对心力衰竭患者心率变异性影响的观察性研究[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 160-164.
[14] 张诚霖, 李学美, 巫惠心, 李晓燕. 心力衰竭患者容量管理护理质量评价指标体系的构建[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 173-178.
[15] 黎俊聪, 黄莹, 杨婵娟, 屠燕. 钠-葡萄糖共转运体2抑制剂治疗心力衰竭的研究进展[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 45-49.
阅读次数
全文


摘要