切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

第五届中国出版政府奖音像电子网络出版物奖提名奖

中国科技核心期刊

中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊

中华重症医学电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (02) : 147 -152. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-1537.2022.02.011

临床研究

舌下微循环监测对脓毒症休克患者并发急性肾损伤的预测价值
陈星月1, 陈新龙1, 王逸平1, 刘向新1, 赵宏胜1,()   
  1. 1. 226001 江苏南通,南通大学附属医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-10 出版日期:2022-07-04
  • 通信作者: 赵宏胜

Significance of sublingual microcirculation monitoring in the early prediction evaluation for acute renal injury in patients with septic shock

Xingyue Chen1, Xinlong Chen1, Yiping Wang1, Xiangxin Liu1, Hongsheng Zhao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, China
  • Received:2022-02-10 Published:2022-07-04
  • Corresponding author: Hongsheng Zhao
引用本文:

陈星月, 陈新龙, 王逸平, 刘向新, 赵宏胜. 舌下微循环监测对脓毒症休克患者并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2022, 08(02): 147-152.

Xingyue Chen, Xinlong Chen, Yiping Wang, Xiangxin Liu, Hongsheng Zhao. Significance of sublingual microcirculation monitoring in the early prediction evaluation for acute renal injury in patients with septic shock[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2022, 08(02): 147-152.

目的

探讨舌下微循环监测对脓毒症休克患者并发急性肾损伤(AKI)的预测价值。

方法

采用前瞻性研究方法,选择2020年5月至2021年5月我院重症医学科连续收治的55例脓毒症休克患者,使用旁流暗视野成像技术(SDF)观察其0、6、24 h舌下微循环图像,根据是否并发AKI分为AKI组(29例)和非AKI组(26例)。比较2组间体循环指标包括心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、中心静脉压(CVP),以及舌下微循环指标包括乳酸(Lac)、中心静脉血氧饱和度(ScvO2)、小血管总密度(TVDs)、灌注小血管密度(PVDs)、小血管灌注比例(PPVs)、变异指数(HI)的变化,采用多因素二元logistic回归分析脓毒症休克并发AKI的危险因素;通过受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)的曲线下面积(AUC)评价舌下微循环指标对脓毒症休克患者并发AKI的预测价值。

结果

在0、6、24 h,与非AKI组相比,AKI组Lac、HI均明显高于非AKI组,PPVs低于非AKI组,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,在0 h HI、PPVs是脓毒症休克患者并发AKI的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,以HI=0.8为临界值时,其预测脓毒症休克患者并发AKI的敏感度为86.21%,特异度为96.15%,AUC为0.917(95%CI:0.811~0.974,P<0.001),以PPVs=81.2%为临界值时,敏感度为72.42%,特异度为96.15%,AUC为0.902(95%CI:0.791~0.966,P<0.001),HI联合PPVs预测脓毒症休克患者并发AKI的AUC为0.928(95%CI:0.827~0.981,P<0.001)。

结论

舌下微循环指标HI联合PPVs对于脓毒症休克患者并发AKI的早期预测有一定的临床参考意义。

Objective

To explore the significance of sublingual microcirculation monitoring in the early prediction evaluation for acute renal injury in patients with septic shock.

Methods

The sublingual microcirculation images of adult patients with septic shock were observed by sidestream dark field imaging (SDF) at 0 h, 6 h and 24 h. These patients were divided into AKI group (29 cases) and non AKI group (26 cases) according to whether they developed acute renal injury (AKI); the changes of systemic circulation indexes including heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP) and sublingual microcirculation indexes including Lac, ScvO2, TVDs, PVDs, PPVs and HI were compared between the two groups. Multivariate binary logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors of septic shock complicated with AKI; the predictive value of sublingual microcirculation index for AKI in patients with septic shock was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC).

Results

At 0 h, 6 h and 24 h, compared with non-AKI group, lactate (Lac) and hetergeneity index (HI) in AKI group were significantly higher than those in non AKI group, and the proportion of perfused small vessels (PPVs) was lower than that in non AKI group (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that at 0 h HI and PPVs were independent risk factors for AKI in patients with septic shock (P<0.05). The ROC curve analysis showed that when HI 0.8 was used as the diagnostic cut-off point, the sensitivity of predicting AKI in patients with septic shock was 86.21%, and the specificity was 96.15 %, AUC was 0.917 (95%CI: 0.811-0.974, P<0.001), when PPVs=81.2% was the diagnostic cut-off point, the sensitivity was 72.42%, the specificity was 96.15%, and the AUC was 0.902 (95%CI: 0.791-0.966, P<0.001), the AUC of HI combined with PPVs for predicting AKI in patients with septic shock was 0.928 (95%CI: 0.827-0.981, P<0.001).

Conclusion

Sublingual microcirculation index HI combined with PPVs has a clinical significance for the early prediction of AKI in patients with septic shock.

图1 脓毒症休克患者入组流程图注:AKI为急性肾损伤
图2 脓毒症休克患者0 h舌下微循环图像。图a为并发急性肾损伤;图b为未并发急性肾损伤
表1 2组脓毒症休克患者一般资料比较(
xˉ
±s
表2 2组脓毒症休克患者不同时间点体循环指标比较(
xˉ
±s
表3 2组脓毒症休克患者不同时间点微循环指标比较(
xˉ
±s
表4 脓毒症休克并发AKI的logistic回归分析
图3 舌下微循环指标预测脓毒症休克并发AKI的ROC曲线注:AKI为急性肾损伤;ROC为受试者工作特征曲线
1
Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021 [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2021, 47(11): 1181-1247.
2
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) [J]. JAMA, 2016, 315(8): 775-787.
3
廖雪莲, 康焰. 脓毒症所致急性肾损伤的研究进展 [J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2017, 3(4): 301-304.
4
Schmidt C, Steinke T, Moritz S, et al. Acute renal failure and sepsis [J]. Der Anaesthesist, 2010, 59(8): 682-699.
5
Evans RG, Ince C, Joles JA, et al. Haemodynamic influences on kidney oxygenation: clinical implications of integrative physiology [J]. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol, 2013, 40(2): 106-122.
6
Cheng X, Wu B, Yun L, et al. Incidence and diagnosis of acute kidney injury in hospitalized adult patients: a retrospective observational study in a tertiary teaching hospital in Southeast China [J]. BMC Nephrol, 2017, 18(1): 203.
7
Ostermann M, Mccullough PA, Forni LG, et al. Kinetics of urinary cell cycle arrest markers for acute kidney injury following exposure to potential renal insults [J]. Crit Care Med, 2018, 46(3): 375-383.
8
Lima A, VanRooij T, Ergin B, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound identifies microcirculatory alterations in sepsis-induced acute kidney injury [J]. Crit Care Med, 2018, 46(8): 1284-1292.
9
Rovin B, Caster D, Cattran D, et al. Management and treatment of glomerular diseases (part 2): conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference [J]. Kidney Int, 2019, 95(2): 281-295.
10
Dilken O, Ergin B, Ince C. Assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: consensus and debate [J]. Ann Transl Med, 2020, 8(12): 793-793.
11
Sharawy N, Mahrous R, Whynot S, et al. Clinical relevance of early sublingual microcirculation monitoring in septic shock patients [J]. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 2018, 68(4): 347-359.
12
Domizi R, Damiani E, Scorcella C, et al. Association between sublingual microcirculation, tissue perfusion and organ failure in major trauma: A subgroup analysis of a prospective observational study[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(3): 0213085.
13
Legrand M, Bezemer R, Kandil A, et al. The role of renal hypoperfusion in development of renal microcirculatory dysfunction in endotoxemic rats [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2011, 37(9): 1534-1542.
14
Lima A, Van Rooij T, Ergin B, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound identifies microcirculatory alterations in sepsis-induced acute kidney injury [J]. Crit Care Med, 2018, 46(8): 1284-1292.
15
Hato T, Maier B, Syed F, et al. Bacterial sepsis triggers an antiviral response that causes translation shutdown [J]. J Clin Invest, 2019, 129(1): 296-309.
16
Jansen TC, van Bommel J, Woodward R, et al. Association between blood lactate levels, sequential organ failure assessment subscores, and 28-day mortality during early and late intensive care unit stay: a retrospective observational study [J]. Crit Care Med. 2009, 37(8):2369-74.
17
Mannucci T, Lippi I, Rota A, et al. Contrast enhancement ultrasound of renal perfusion in dogs with acute kidney injury [J]. J Small Anim Pract, 2019, 60(8): 471-476.
18
Selby NM, Williams JP, Phillips BE, et al. Application of dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound in the assessment of kidney diseases [J]. CurrOpin Nephrol Hypertens, 2021, 30(1): 138-143.
[1] 张婧琦, 江洋, 孙佳璐, 唐兴喆, 赵宇飞, 崔颖, 李信响, 戴景月, 傅琳, 彭新桂. 基于肾周CT特征结合血清肌酐水平探讨脓毒症伴急性肾损伤的早期识别[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 285-292.
[2] 樊恒, 孙敏, 朱建华. 红景天苷通过抑制PI3K/AKT/mTOR信号通路对大鼠脓毒症急性肾损伤的保护作用[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 188-195.
[3] 张锦丽, 席毛毛, 褚志刚, 栾夏刚, 陈诺, 王德运, 谢卫国. 大面积烧伤患者发生早期急性肾损伤的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 282-287.
[4] 彭瑞, 杨瑞文, 魏澹宁, 夏永良. 琥珀酸受体1加重肾脏缺血再灌注损伤的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 159-164.
[5] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会. 中国肝移植受者肾损伤管理临床实践指南(2023版)[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 276-288.
[6] 杜霞, 马梦青, 曹长春. 造影剂诱导的急性肾损伤的发病机制及干预靶点研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 279-282.
[7] 郭俊楠, 林惠, 任艺林, 乔晞. 氨基酸代谢异常在急性肾损伤向慢性肾脏病转变中的作用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 283-287.
[8] 袁楠, 黄梦杰, 白云凤, 李晓帆, 罗从娟, 陈健文. 急性肾损伤-慢性肾脏病转化小鼠模型制备的教学要点及学习效果分析[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 226-230.
[9] 林玲, 李京儒, 沈瑞华, 林惠, 乔晞. 基于生物信息学分析小鼠急性肾损伤和急性肺损伤的枢纽基因[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 134-144.
[10] 庞明敏, 闫美辰, 刘光凤, 宫继斌, 许娜娜, 郑玥, 范少华, 王昊. 脓毒症液体复苏治疗策略的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 189-195.
[11] 杨磊, 汪美华, 胡锦. 急性脑梗死去骨瓣术后合并碳青霉烯耐药肺炎克雷伯菌感染一例[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 200-204.
[12] 司楠, 孙洪涛. 创伤性脑损伤后肾功能障碍危险因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 300-305.
[13] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[14] 崔秋子, 姚红曼, 艾迎春. 监测NLR、PLR、CAR、白蛋白、血钙及血糖指标水平对急性胰腺炎患者急性肾损伤的预测价值分析[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 244-248.
[15] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
阅读次数
全文


摘要