Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02): 141-146. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-1537.2026.02.008

• Clinical Researches • Previous Articles    

Prognosis of patients with infected pancreatic necrosis undergoing laparoscopic retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy

Zhendong Fang1, Weipeng Huang1, Yifan Gao1, Hong Yu2, Bo Shen2, Feng Guo1,()   

  1. 1 Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China
    2 Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China
  • Received:2025-07-17 Online:2026-05-28 Published:2026-06-18
  • Contact: Feng Guo

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the impact of laparoscopic retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy (LPRN) on 90-day mortality and 30-day postoperative bleeding in IPN patients.

Methods

A single-center retrospective cohort study included 87 IPN patients who were admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from January 2013 to December 2020. Patients were divided into the LPRN group (n=65) and the open surgery group (n=22). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, multivariate Cox regression, and Logistic regression were used to assess the impact of LPRN on patient outcomes.

Results

The 90-day mortality rate was significantly lower in the LPRN group compared to the open surgery group (12.31% vs 45.45%, P<0.001), and the incidence of postoperative bleeding within 30 days was also significantly reduced (15.38% vs 40.91%, P=0.012). Multivariate regression analysis showed that LPRN significantly reduced the 90-day mortality risk (HR=0.13, 95% CI: 0.02-0.55) and the risk of 30-day postoperative bleeding (OR=0.24, 95% CI: 0.07-0.74). E-value analysis indicated the robustness of these results to potential unmeasured confounding. Subgroup analysis further confirmed that the trend towards improved outcomes associated with LPRN remained consistent across stratifications based on etiology, hematocrit, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and the presence of preoperative septic shock.

Conclusion

LPRN may be associated with improved short-term outcomes in patients with infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN), though this requires further validation through prospective studies. Clinical decision-making should be based on individual patient factors, and the long-term efficacy as well as the applicable scope of LPRN need to be further investigated.

Key words: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy, Severe acute pancreatitis, Infected pancreatic necrosis

京ICP 备07035254号-19
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322627 E-mail: ccm@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd