Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (02): 115-119. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-1537.2021.02.004

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy with different flow rates on respiratory mechanics after extubation in patients with invasive ventilation

Guangsheng Lu1, Kang Wu2, Shiya Wang2, Zhenjie Jiang2, Baozhu Zhang2, Zhimin Wang3, Qiang Chen2, Chun Yang2, Qingwen Sun2, Yuanda Xu2()   

  1. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, First People's Hospital of Zhaoqing, Zhaoqing 526000, China
    2. Department of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health,Guangzhou 510030, China
    3. Department of Critical Care Medicine, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510700, China;Corresponding auther: Xu Yuanda, Email: xuyuanda@sina.com
  • Received:2020-11-15 Online:2021-05-28 Published:2021-08-13
  • Contact: Yuanda Xu

Abstract:

Objective

To explore the effects of different flow rates under high-flow nasal cannula on the respiratory mechanics in patients with invasive ventilation after extubation, to provide reference for clinical selection.

Methods

Nine critically ill patients who admitted in the ICU of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, from December 2018 to June 2020 underwent three different flow rate HFNC (20, 40, 60 L/min) 24-48 h after extraction. The respiratory mechanics were measured by the indwelling multifunctional monitoring nasogastric tube. The effects of HFNC with different flow rates on the respiratory mechanics were compared.

Results

Nine patients including 3 females and 6 males, with an average age of (67.2±14.1) years old were included. Diaphragm myoelectricity (EMGdi) amplitude of HFNC at 60 L/min and 40 L/min was lower than 20 L/min (P<0.05). The esophageal pressure (Pes), gastric pressure (Pga), transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi), esophageal pressure-time product (PTPes), intragastric pressure-time product (PTPga), transdiaphragmatic pressure-time product (PTPdi), inspiratory time (Ti), expiratory time (Te), esophageal pressure variation rate (CVes), myoelectric variation rate (CVemg), the ratio of esophageal pressure to transdiaphragmatic pressure change (Pes/Pdi) and the ratio of transdiaphragmatic pressure-time product to esophageal pressure-time product (PTPdi/PTPes) had no significant difference at 20, 40, and 60 L/min during HFNC.

Conclusion

Choosing 20, 40, 60 L/min HFNC for sequential non-invasive adjuvant therapy after removing the artificial airway has no significant effect on respiratory mechanics. While, when the flow rate of 40 L/min, HFNC can effectively improve lung ventilation and comfort.

Key words: High-flow nasal cannula, Mechanical ventilation, Respiratory mechanics

京ICP 备07035254号-19
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322627 E-mail: ccm@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd