切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

第五届中国出版政府奖音像电子网络出版物奖提名奖

中国科技核心期刊

中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊

中华重症医学电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (04) : 320 -322. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-1537.2018.04.005

所属专题: 重症医学 文献

专题笔谈

血液灌流治疗急性百草枯中毒笔谈
谢云1, 王瑞兰1,()   
  1. 1. 201620 上海市第一人民医院急诊危重病科
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-02 出版日期:2018-11-28
  • 通信作者: 王瑞兰

Clinical progress in treating acute paraquat poisoning with hemoperfusion

Yun Xie1, Ruilan Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of ICU, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai 201620, China
  • Received:2018-10-02 Published:2018-11-28
  • Corresponding author: Ruilan Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Ruilan, Email:
引用本文:

谢云, 王瑞兰. 血液灌流治疗急性百草枯中毒笔谈[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2018, 04(04): 320-322.

Yun Xie, Ruilan Wang. Clinical progress in treating acute paraquat poisoning with hemoperfusion[J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2018, 04(04): 320-322.

急性百草枯(PQ)中毒的病死率极高,血液灌流(HP)作为PQ中毒救治的推荐方法,已经在我国得到了广泛应用,但对于HP强度以及是否合并血液透析等治疗方案目前仍无定论。最新的《2013百草枯诊治国内专家共识》推荐的方法,是HP时使用1个或多个灌流器、重复数次。而在临床实践中,临床医师多依据临床经验进行判断,随意性较大。本文就HP治疗PQ中毒的时机、模式、重复次数、以及其他合并治疗作一笔谈,以期对将来临床治疗和临床研究有所帮助。

Numerous animal experiments and clinical trials have been conducted in treating acute paraquat poisoning with hemoperfusion (HP). However, the mortality of acute paraquat poisoning remains high. Although it is still a controversy, HP has been widely used in China as the recommended treatment of paraquat poisoning. The latest Chinese experts′ consensus on management of paraquat poisoning (2013) recommends to perform repeated hemoperfusion with one or multiple cartridges. In clinical practice, physicians tend to make clinical decisions based on personal judgment. To provide additional evidence for future practice and research in this field, we summarized previous studies and made discussions on HP in treating paraquat poisoning, which included timing, patterns, times of repetition and combination treatment.

1
Shi Y, Bai Y, Zou Y, et al. The value of plasma paraquat concentration in predicting therapeutic effects of haemoperfusion in patients with acute paraquat poisoning [J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(7): e40911.
2
Yoon SC. Clinical outcome of paraquat poisoning [J]. Korean J Intern Med, 2009, 24(2): 93-94.
3
Yin Y, Guo X, Zhang SL, et al. Analysis of paraquat intoxication epidemic (2002-2011) within China [J]. Biomed Environ Sci, 2013, 26(6): 509-512.
4
Kang MS, Gil HW, Yang JO, et al. Comparison between kidney and hemoperfusion for paraquat elimination [J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2009, 24 Suppl: S156-160.
5
Suzuki K, Takasu N, Okabe T, et al. Effect of aggressive haemoperfusion on the clinical course of patients with paraquat poisoning [J]. Hum Exp Toxicol, 1993, 12(4): 323-327.
6
Yang TS, Chang YL, Yen CK. Haemoperfusion treatment in pigsexperimentally intoxicated by paraquat [J]. Hum Exp Toxicol, 1997, 16(12): 709-715.
7
Hampson EC, Effeney DJ, Pond SM, et al. Efficacy of single or repeated hemoperfusion in a canine model of paraquat poisoning [J]. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 1990, 254(2): 732.
8
Li GQ, Li YM, Wei LQ, et al. Comparison between kidney and continuous plasma perfusion for paraquat elimination [J]. Am J Med Sci, 2014, 348(3): 195.
9
Kim HJ, Kim HK, Lee H, et al. Toxicokinetics of paraquat in Korean patients with acute poisoning [J]. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol, 2016, 20(1): 35.
10
Houzé P, Baud FJ, Mouy R, et al. Toxicokinetics of paraquat in humans [J]. Hum exp Toxicol, 1990, 9(1): 5.
11
Hart TB, Nevitt A, Whitehead A. A new statistical approach to the prognostic significance of plasma paraquat concentrations [J]. Lancet, 1984, 2(8413): 1222-1223.
12
Proudfoot AT, Stewart MS, Levitt T, et al. Paraquat poisoning: significance of plasma-paraquat concentrations [J]. Lancet, 1979, 2(8138): 330-332.
13
Scherrmann JM, Houze P, Bismuth C, et al. Prognostic value of plasma and urine paraquat concentration.[J]. Hum Toxicol, 1987, 6(1): 91.
14
Bismuth C, Schewmann JM, Gamierl L, et al. Elimination of paraquat [J]. Hum Toxicol, 1987, 6(1): 63-67.
15
Hong SY, Yang DH, Hwang KY, et al. Associations between laboratory Parameters and outcome of paraquat poisoning [J]. Toxicol Lett, 2008, l18(122): 53-59.
16
Wang Y, Chen Y, Mao L, et al. Effects of hemoperfusion and continuous renal replacement therapy on patient survival following paraquat poisoning [J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(7): e0181207.
17
Winchester JF, Boldur A, Oleru C, et al. Use of dialysis and hemoperfusion in treatment of poisoning [M]. 4th ed, Handbook of Dialysis, 2006.
18
Feinfeld DA, Rosenberg JW, Winchester JF. Three controversial issues in extracorporeal toxin removal [J]. Semin Dial, 2006, 19(5): 358-362.
19
Yang TS, Chang YL, Yen CK. Hemoperfusion treatment in pigs experimentally intoxicated by paraquat [J]. Hum Exp Toxicol, 1997, 16(12): 709-715.
20
Park S, Lee S, Park S, et al. Concurrent hemoperfusion and hemodialysis in patients with acute pesticide intoxication [J]. Blood Purif, 2016, 42(4): 329-336.
21
中国医师协会急诊医师分会. 急性百草枯中毒诊治专家共识(2013) [J]. 中国急救医学, 2013, 33(6): 484-489.
22
Rao R, Bhat R, Pathadka S, et al. Golden hours in severe paraquat poisoning-the role of early haemoperfusion therapy [J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2017, 11(2): OC06-OC08.
[1] 陆远强. 急性中毒[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(01): 0-.
[2] 石乔, 张晓艺, 李汉军, 蒋芳, 徐冬雪, 熊星铖, 余佳, 王卫星, 陶京. 持续静脉-静脉血液滤过联合血液灌流治疗高脂血症性急性胰腺炎疗效的系统评价[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(06): 439-445.
[3] 唐芹芳, 孙明忠, 傅庆萍, 肖丽华, 颜冬梅, 王颖, 季宏建. 糖尿病患者索氏梭菌感染致中毒性休克综合征一例[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 354-358.
[4] 陈赫赫, 王艳, 董卓亚, 严信朝, 阮培森, 管华. 儿童急性敌草快中毒诊治三例[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2021, 07(02): 180-184.
[5] 张勇, 周丽, 何斌. BDNF Val66Met基因多态性对急性一氧化碳中毒迟发性脑病患者疗效的影响[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(06): 355-359.
[6] 徐飞, 江亚, 刘超, 吴瑶, 李冰. 序贯性血液净化联合纳洛酮对急性中毒患者血气分析、血液流变学和炎症因子的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 236-240.
[7] 徐飞, 唐荣, 梁建军, 范志刚. 血清HSP70、Caspase-3联合检测对急性一氧化碳中毒迟发性脑病的预测价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 71-76.
[8] 王松, 王志坚. 妊娠合并糖尿病酮症酸中毒的识别和处理[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2021, 10(01): 31-35.
[9] 陈士超, 张艳敏, 刘乃政, 曲爱君. 乳酸及降钙素原对一氧化碳中毒后迟发性脑病的预测价值[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 272-275.
[10] 陈艾萍, 王建文, 伍宏. 不同血液净化模式治疗横纹肌溶解症的疗效比较[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2020, 06(06): 332-336.
[11] 黄翠君, 周从阳, 叶兴文. 百草枯中毒患者肺肾损伤顺序对预后的影响[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2019, 05(06): 344-347.
[12] 杨碧兰, 林勇, 孙国刚. 101例老年中毒患者原因分析及对策[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2019, 05(05): 277-280.
[13] 于光彩, 菅向东. 口服有机磷混配农药中毒的临床诊断与救治策略[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2019, 05(04): 202-206.
[14] 黄朝晖, 刘仁华, 杨立文. 血液透析联合血液灌流对尿毒症患者机体铁及内环境代谢的影响及相关性分析[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2022, 08(03): 169-173.
[15] 李健, 张京芬, 马妮娅, 郭晓红, 刘国荣. 丁苯酞对一氧化碳中毒迟发性脑病的临床疗效及磁共振脑白质病变的影响[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 182-187.
阅读次数
全文


摘要