切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

第五届中国出版政府奖音像电子网络出版物奖提名奖

中国科技核心期刊

中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊

中华重症医学电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (02) : 151 -155. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-1537.2020.02.009

所属专题: 重症医学 文献

专题笔谈

心源性休克时机械循环辅助设备的应用
刘凯1, 苏迎1, 屠国伟1, 罗哲2,()   
  1. 1. 200032 上海,复旦大学附属中山医院重症医学科
    2. 200032 上海,复旦大学附属中山医院重症医学科;361015 厦门,复旦大学附属中山医院厦门分院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-14 出版日期:2020-05-28
  • 通信作者: 罗哲
  • 基金资助:
    上海市卫生健康系统重要薄弱学科建设基金(2019ZB0105); 中山医院厦门医院临床科室学科建设基金(XYYX201922); 中山医院青年基金(2019ZSQN13)

Application of mechanical circulation support devices in cardiogenic shock

Kai Liu1, Ying Su1, Guowei Tu1, Zhe Luo2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
    2. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xiamen 361015, China
  • Received:2020-01-14 Published:2020-05-28
  • Corresponding author: Zhe Luo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Luo Zhe, Email:
引用本文:

刘凯, 苏迎, 屠国伟, 罗哲. 心源性休克时机械循环辅助设备的应用[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2020, 06(02): 151-155.

Kai Liu, Ying Su, Guowei Tu, Zhe Luo. Application of mechanical circulation support devices in cardiogenic shock[J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2020, 06(02): 151-155.

心源性休克是一类高死亡率的疾病,需要早期诊断和多学科团队干预。应用机械循环辅助设备可以避免心源性休克患者病情的持续进展,但合适的时机、设备选择及管理仍然是难点。本文就心源性休克患者机械循环辅助设备的应用进行综述。

Cardiogenic shock remains a disease with high mortality that requires early diagnosis and multidisciplinary intervention. The application of mechanical circulation support devices can interrupt the progression of cardiogenic shock, but the appropriate timing, equipment selection, and management are still under debate. This review will outline the application of mechanical circulatory support devices in patients with cardiogenic shock.

表1 常见经皮机械循环辅助设备的基本特征
1
van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, et al. Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the american heart association[J]. Circulation, 2017, 136(16): e232-e268.
2
Mebazaa A, Combes A, van Diepen S, et al. Management of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2018, 44(6): 760-773.
3
Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory shock[J]. N Engl J Med, 2013, 369(18): 1726-1734.
4
Thiele H, Ohman EM, de Waha-Thiele S, et al. Management of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: an update 2019[J]. Eur Heart J, 2019, 40(32): 2671-2683.
5
Bellumkonda L, Gul B, Masri SC. Evolving concepts in diagnosis and management of cardiogenic shock[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2018, 122(6): 1104-1110.
6
Hajjar LA, Teboul JL. Mechanical circulatory support devices for cardiogenic shock: state of the art[J]. Critical Care, 2019, 23(1): 76.
7
Taleb I, Koliopoulou AG, Tandar A, et al. Shock team approach in refractory cardiogenic shock requiring short-term mechanical circulatory support: a proof of concept[J]. Circulation, 2019, 140(1): 98-100.
8
Combes A, Brodie D, Chen YS, et al. The ICM research agenda on extracorporeal life support[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2017, 43(9): 1306-1318.
9
Kapelios CJ, Terrovitis JV, Nanas JN. Current and future applications of the intra-aortic balloon pump[J]. Curr Opin Cardiol, 2014, 29(3): 258-265.
10
Prondzinsky R, Unverzagt S, Russ M, et al. Hemodynamic effects of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: the prospective, randomized IABP shock trial[J]. Shock, 2012, 37(4): 378-384.
11
Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock[J]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 367(14): 1287-1296.
12
Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial[J]. Lancet, 2013, 382(9905): 1638-1645.
13
Thiele H, Zeymer U, Thelemann N, et al. Intraaortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: long-term 6-year outcome of the randomized IABP-SHOCK II trial[J]. Circulation, 2019, 139: 395-403.
14
Sandhu A, McCoy LA, Negi SI, et al. Use of mechanical circulatory support in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry[J]. Circulation, 2015, 132(13): 1243-1251.
15
Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization[J]. Eur Heart J, 2019, 40(2): 87-165.
16
Miceli A, Fiorani B, Danesi TH, , et al. Prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a propensity score analysis[J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2009, 9(2): 291-294.
17
Keebler ME, Haddad EV, Choi CW, et al. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock[J]. JACC Heart Fail, 2018, 6(6): 503-516.
18
Rao P, Khalpey Z, Smith R, et al. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest[J]. Circ Heart Fail, 2018, 11(9): e004905.
19
Guglin M, Zucker MJ, Bazan VM, et al. Venoarterial ECMO for Adults: JACC Scientific Expert Panel[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2019, 73(6): 698-716.
20
Ouweneel DM, Schotborgh JV, Limpens J, et al. Extracorporeal life support during cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2016, 42(12): 1922-1934.
21
Eckman PM, Katz JN, El Banayosy A, et al. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock: an introduction for the busy clinician[J]. Circulation, 2019, 140(24): 2019-2037.
22
Bougouin W, Dumas F, Lamhaut L, et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a registry study[J]. Eur Heart J, 2019 Oct 31. pii: ehz753
23
Ostadal P, Rokyta R, Kruger A, et al. Extra corporeal membrane oxygenation in the therapy of cardiogenic shock (ECMO-CS): rationale and design of the multicenter randomized trial[J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 2017, 19 (Suppl 2): 124-127.
24
Chang CH, Chen HC, Caffrey JL, et al. Survival analysis after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in critically III adults: a nationwide cohort study[J]. Circulation, 2016, 133(24): 2423-2433.
25
Vallabhajosyula S, Prasad A, Bell MR, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use in acute myocardial infarction in the United States, 2000 to 2014[J]. Circ Heart Fail, 2019, 12(12): e005929.
26
Han JJ, Swain JD. The perfect ECMO candidate[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2018, 71(10): 1178-1182.
27
Lopez-Sobrino T, Yusef H, Gershlick T. Predicting outcomes in cardiogenic shock: are we at risk of having too many scores but too little information?[J]. Eur Heart J, 2019, 40(32): 2695-2699.
28
Cheng R, Hachamovitch R, Kittleson M, et al. Complications of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for treatment of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis of 1,866 adult patients[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2014, 97(2): 610-616.
29
Bonicolini E, Martucci G, Simons J, et al. Limb ischemia in peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a narrative review of incidence, prevention, monitoring, and treatment[J]. Crit Care, 2019, 23(1): 266.
30
Thiele H, Sick P, Boudriot E, et al. Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock[J]. Eur Heart J., 2005, 26(13): 1276-1283.
31
Seyfarth M, Sibbing D, Bauer I, , et al. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008, 52(19): 1584-1588.
32
Kar B, Gregoric ID, Basra SS, , et al. The percutaneous ventricular assist device in severe refractory cardiogenic shock[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2011, 57(6): 688-696.
33
Lauten A, Engstrom AE, Jung C, et al. Percutaneous left-ventricular support with the Impella-2.5-assist device in acute cardiogenic shock: results of the Impella-EUROSHOCK-registry[J]. Circ Heart Fail, 2013, 6(1): 23-30.
34
Ouweneel DM, Eriksen E, Sjauw KD, et al. Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support versus intra-aortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2017, 69(3): 278-287.
35
Thiele H, Jobs A, Ouweneel DM, et al. Percutaneous short-term active mechanical support devices in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials[J]. Eur Heart J, 2017, 38(47): 3523-3531.
36
Schrage B, Ibrahim K, Loehn T, et al. Impella support for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock[J]. Circulation, 2019, 139(10): 1249-1258.
37
Poulidakis E, Spaulding C. Cardiac assist devices in cardiogenic shock[J]. Circulation, 2019, 139(10): 1259-1261.
38
O′Neill WW, Grines C, Schreiber T, et al. Analysis of outcomes for 15,259 US patients with acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock (AMICS) supported with the Impella device[J]. Am Heart J, 2018, 202: 33-38.
39
Amin AP, Spertus JA, Curtis JP, et al. The evolving landscape of impella(r) use in the united states among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with mechanical circulatory support[J]. Circulation, 2020, 141(4): 273-284.
40
Kapur NK, Esposito ML, Bader Y, et al. Mechanical circulatory support devices for acute right ventricular failure[J]. Circulation, 2017, 136(3): 314-326.
41
Anderson MB, Goldstein J, Milano C, et al. Benefits of a novel percutaneous ventricular assist device for right heart failure: The prospective RECOVER RIGHT study of the Impella RP device[J]. J Heart Lung Transplant, 2015, 34(12): 1549-1560.
[1] 赵洪峰, 王淑颖, 胡炜, 聂世姣, 费莹, 石尚世, 储华英, 王剑荣. 体外膜肺氧合相关血流感染危险因素及预测模型建立[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 98-104.
[2] 陈婧, 姚杨, 苗继荣, 丁格, 马青, 彭伊梦, 卢洲, 康凤尔, 王胜昱. 静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合联合主动脉内球囊反搏对心源性疾病患者病死率的影响:Meta分析[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(01): 48-59.
[3] 陈娇, 王立伟, 孙斌, 张萌, 刘倩, 周美艳, 丁文平, 张伟. 体外膜肺氧合联合主动脉内球囊反搏在暴发性心肌炎救治中的应用[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(01): 6-12.
[4] 张忠满, 朱轶, 李伟, 安迪, 邹乐, 夏雨, 丁涛, 时育彤, 陈旭锋. 行体外膜肺氧合患者脑出血危险因素分析[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 454-459.
[5] 童洪杰, 陈琨, 潘飞艳, 倪红英. 俯卧位通气对静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合支持的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者病死率影响的Meta分析[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(04): 312-317.
[6] 康绍涛, 布祖克拉·阿布都艾尼, 李英杰, 拜合提尼沙·吐尔地. 体外膜肺氧合治疗脓毒症患者生存预后的Meta分析[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(01): 51-59.
[7] 张明光, 李斌飞, 吴少花. 婴幼儿颈部通路体外膜肺氧合相关性出血并发症分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 282-285.
[8] 滕鹏, 郑骏楠, 郭雷, 胡鹏, 倪程耀, 赵海格, 马量. 心脏移植术前体外膜肺氧合循环辅助桥接33例疗效分析[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 339-345.
[9] 郑珊珊, 郑哲, 黄洁, 廖中凯, 宋云虎, 房晓楠, 刘盛. 主动脉内球囊反搏作为心脏移植桥接治疗对晚期心力衰竭合并肺动脉高压患者的疗效[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 277-284.
[10] 惠姣洁, 梁锋鸣, 王逸峰, 王大鹏, 陈静瑜, 许红阳. 肺移植术后体外膜肺氧合流量不足处理经验[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 238-240.
[11] 梅喜平, 袁利学, 祝小梅, 袁法伟, 李炳奇, 叶俊伟, 刘栋, 王雪琴, 郑鲲, 冯辉斌. 体外膜肺氧合在危重症患者中的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(02): 206-208.
[12] 方可, 笪欢欢, 汪君, 孙瑞祥, 王涛, 李阳, 江海娇, 鲁卫华. ECMO联合肾上腺切除救治妊娠期嗜铬细胞瘤并儿茶酚胺心肌病一例并文献回顾[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 304-310.
[13] 高学慧, 邹晓静, 杨小博, 尚游. 甲磺酸萘莫司他在重症患者CRRT与ECMO中抗凝应用的研究进展[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 210-216.
[14] 尹承芬, 徐磊. 再议俯卧位通气的时机[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 9-13.
[15] 尹承芬, 徐磊. ARDS患者V-V ECMO支持期间机械通气设置的研究[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2022, 08(04): 378-383.
阅读次数
全文


摘要