切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

第五届中国出版政府奖音像电子网络出版物奖提名奖

中国科技核心期刊

中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊

中华重症医学电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (02) : 160 -164. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-1537.2020.02.011

所属专题: 重症医学 文献

专题笔谈

脓毒症相关微循环障碍的研究进展
沈延飞1, 蔡国龙1,()   
  1. 1. 310030 杭州,浙江医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-12 出版日期:2020-05-28
  • 通信作者: 蔡国龙
  • 基金资助:
    国家卫生健康委科学研究基金-浙江省医药卫生重大科技计划项目(WKJ-ZJ-2001); 浙江省自然科学基金(LY20H150007)

Research progress of microcirculation disorders associated with sepsis

Yanfei Shen1, Guolong Cai1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou 310030, China
  • Received:2020-05-12 Published:2020-05-28
  • Corresponding author: Guolong Cai
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Cai Guolong, Email:
引用本文:

沈延飞, 蔡国龙. 脓毒症相关微循环障碍的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2020, 06(02): 160-164.

Yanfei Shen, Guolong Cai. Research progress of microcirculation disorders associated with sepsis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2020, 06(02): 160-164.

维持大循环灌注是脓毒症复苏过程中重要目标之一,但临床过程中,大循环-微循环失耦联状态并不少见,即大循环已处于稳态,但微循环仍存在障碍。若不能及早识别干预失耦联状态,往往导致器官功能障碍等不良事件发生。因此,如何合理地监测微循环在脓毒症治疗中显得尤为重要。本文旨在对脓毒症中微循环障碍的发生、发展以及监测方法作一简要综述。

Maintaining generalorgan perfusion is one of the important goals in the fluid resuscitation of sepsis. However, macrocirculation-microcirculation miscouple is quite common in clinical practice: even the generalorgan perfusion is well maintained, the microcirculation disorder are still common in sepsis, which may lead to subsequent organ dysfunction. Therefore, how to monitor microcirculation is particularly important in the treatment of sepsis. The occurrence, development and monitoring of microcirculation disorder in sepsis were reviewed in this article.

1
Vincent JL, Opal SM, Marshall JC, et al. Sepsis definitions: time for change[J]. Lancet, 2013, 381(9868): 774-775.
2
Serpa Neto A, Cardoso SO, Ong DS, et al. The use of the pulse oximetric saturation/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio for risk stratification of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock[J]. Journal of Critical Care, 2013, 28(5):681-686.
3
Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Xue Y, et al. Prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and its potential role in guiding fluid therapy in critically ill septic patients[J]. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2012, 20: 86.
4
Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock[J]. Crit Care Med, 2004, 32(3): 858-873.
5
De Backer D, Donadello K, Sakr Y, et al. Microcirculatory alterations in patients with severe sepsis: impact of time of assessment and relationship with outcome[J]. Critical Care Medicine, 2013, 41(3): 791-799.
6
Ince C. Hemodynamic coherence and the rationale for monitoring the microcirculation[J]. Crit Care, 2015, 19 (Suppl 3): S8.
7
De Backer D, Creteur J, Preiser JC, et al. Microvascular blood flow is altered in patients with sepsis[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2002, 166(1): 98-104.
8
Sakr Y, Dubois MJ, De Backer D, et al. Persistent microcirculatory alterations are associated with organ failure and death in patients with septic shock[J]. Critical Care Medicine, 2004, 32(9): 1825-1831.
9
Trzeciak S, Dellinger RP, Parrillo JE, et al. Early microcirculatory perfusion derangements in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: relationship to hemodynamics, oxygen transport, and survival[J]. Ann Emerg Med, 2007, 49(1): 88-98, e81-82.
10
Trzeciak S, McCoy JV, Phillip Dellinger R, et al. Early increases in microcirculatory perfusion during protocol-directed resuscitation are associated with reduced multi-organ failure at 24 h in patients with sepsis[J]. Intensive Care Medicine, 2008, 34(12): 2210-2217.
11
Dubin A, Pozo MO, Casabella CA, et al. Increasing arterial blood pressure with norepinephrine does not improve microcirculatory blood flow: a prospective study[J]. Crit Care, 2009, 13(3): R92.
12
Boerma EC, Koopmans M, Konijn A, et al. Effects of nitroglycerin on sublingual microcirculatory blood flow in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock after a strict resuscitation protocol: a double-blind randomized placebo controlled trial[J]. Critical Care Medicine, 2010, 38(1): 93-100.
13
Bakker J. Lactate levels and hemodynamic coherence in acute circulatory failure[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2016, 30(4): 523-530.
14
Sekino M, Funaoka H, Sato S, et al. Association Between Macroscopic Tongue Ischemia and Enterocyte Injury and Poor Outcome in Patients With Septic Shock: A Preliminary Observational Study[J]. Shock, 2018, 50(5): 530-537.
15
Ait-Oufella H, Bourcier S, Lehoux S, et al. Microcirculatory disorders during septic shock[J]. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2015, 21(4): 271-275.
16
Ratiani L, Gamkrelidze M, Khuchua E, et al. Altered Microcirculation in Septic Shock[J]. Georgian Med News, 2015(244-245): 16-24.
17
Mutunga M, Fulton B, Bullock R, et al. Circulating endothelial cells in patients with septic shock[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2001, 163(1): 195-200.
18
Sessler CN, Windsor AC, Schwartz M, et al. Circulating ICAM-1 is increased in septic shock[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1995, 151(5): 1420-1427.
19
Levi M, van der Poll T, Buller HR. Bidirectional relation between inflammation and coagulation[J]. Circulation, 2004, 109(22): 2698-2704.
20
Lima A, Bakker J. Clinical assessment of peripheral circulation[J]. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2015, 21(3): 226-231.
21
Hernandez G, Bruhn A, Castro R, et al. The holistic view on perfusion monitoring in septic shock[J]. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2012, 18(3): 280-286.
22
Lima A, Jansen TC, van Bommel J, et al. The prognostic value of the subjective assessment of peripheral perfusion in critically ill patients[J]. Critical Care Medicine, 2009, 37(3): 934-938.
23
Hernandez G, Pedreros C, Veas E, et al. Evolution of peripheral vs metabolic perfusion parameters during septic shock resuscitation. A clinical-physiologic study[J]. Journal of Critical Care, 2012, 27(3): 283-288.
24
Ait-Oufella H, Bige N, Boelle PY, Pichereau C, et al. Capillary refill time exploration during septic shock[J]. Intensive Care Medicine, 2014, 40(7): 958-964.
25
Hernandez G, Luengo C, Bruhn A, et al. When to stop septic shock resuscitation: clues from a dynamic perfusion monitoring[J]. Ann Intensive Care, 2014, 4: 30.
26
Qian J, Yang Z, Cahoon J, et al. Post-resuscitation intestinal microcirculation: its relationship with sublingual microcirculation and the severity of post-resuscitation syndrome[J]. Resuscitation, 2014, 85(6): 833-839.
27
Rovas A, Lukasz AH, Vink H, et al. Bedside analysis of the sublingual microvascular glycocalyx in the emergency room and intensive care unit-the GlycoNurse study[J]. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2018, 26(1): 16.
28
Gilbert-Kawai E, Coppel J, Bountziouka V, et al. A comparison of the quality of image acquisition between the incident dark field and sidestream dark field video-microscopes[J]. BMC Med Imaging, 2016, 16: 10.
29
Hildebrandt W, Schwarzbach H, Pardun A, et al. Age-related differences in skeletal muscle microvascular response to exercise as detected by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)[J]. PloS one, 2017, 12(3): e0172771.
30
Diana M, Dallemagne B, Chung H, , et al. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy and fluorescence-based enhanced reality for real-time assessment of intestinal microcirculation in a porcine model of sigmoid ischemia[J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(11): 3224-3233.
[1] 庄燕, 戴林峰, 张海东, 陈秋华, 聂清芳. 脓毒症患者早期生存影响因素及Cox 风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 372-378.
[2] 杨瑾, 刘雪克, 张媛媛, 金钧, 韦瑶. 肠道微生物来源石胆酸对脓毒症相关肝损伤的保护作用[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 265-274.
[3] 张霞, 张瑞, 郑志波, 张勤. 紫草素调控乳酸化修饰和线粒体功能改善脓毒症心肌病小鼠的预后[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 275-284.
[4] 张婧琦, 江洋, 孙佳璐, 唐兴喆, 赵宇飞, 崔颖, 李信响, 戴景月, 傅琳, 彭新桂. 基于肾周CT特征结合血清肌酐水平探讨脓毒症伴急性肾损伤的早期识别[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 285-292.
[5] 李振翮, 魏长青, 甄国栋, 李振富. 脓毒症并发急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者血清S1P、Wnt5a变化及其临床意义[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 293-300.
[6] 樊恒, 孙敏, 朱建华. 红景天苷通过抑制PI3K/AKT/mTOR信号通路对大鼠脓毒症急性肾损伤的保护作用[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 188-195.
[7] 陈曦, 吴宗盛, 郑明珠, 邱海波. 胸腺萎缩在脓毒症免疫紊乱中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 379-383.
[8] 杨翔, 郭兰骐, 谢剑锋, 邱海波. 转录组学在脓毒症诊疗中的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 384-388.
[9] 成人脓毒症患者β-内酰胺类抗生素延长输注专家共识编写组. 成人脓毒症患者β-内酰胺类抗生素延长输注专家共识[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 313-324.
[10] 胡梓菡, 彭菲, 孙骎, 杨毅. 细胞外囊泡在脓毒症血管内皮损伤作用中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 265-270.
[11] 刘娟丽, 马四清, 乌仁塔娜. 髓源性抑制细胞在脓毒症中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 271-278.
[12] 苏生林, 马金兰, 于弘明, 杨晓军. 单细胞测序技术在脓毒症免疫研究中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 279-286.
[13] 陈惠英, 邱敏珊, 邵汉权. 脓毒症诱发肠黏膜屏障功能损伤的风险因素模型构建与应用效果[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 448-452.
[14] 傅新露, 李之岳, 卢丹. 妊娠合并结肠癌穿孔致脓毒症休克一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 227-231.
[15] 席静妮, 李娜, 张琪. 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对老年重症社区获得性肺炎进展为脓毒症的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 28-31.
阅读次数
全文


摘要