切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

第五届中国出版政府奖音像电子网络出版物奖提名奖

中国科技核心期刊

中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊

中华重症医学电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (02) : 132 -136. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-1537.2021.02.007

临床研究

血栓弹力图在高血压脑出血手术与非手术患者中的改变
王皓1, 刘晓琴1, 何宗钊1, 陈强1, 孙斌1,(), 杨正平1, 马四清1   
  1. 1. 810007 西宁,青海省人民医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-30 出版日期:2021-05-28
  • 通信作者: 孙斌
  • 基金资助:
    青海省高原重症医学重点实验室项目(2020-81); 青海省科技创新创业项目(高原低氧损害防治研究重症医学创新创业团队)(2020-66); 青海省科技厅基础研究计划项目(2019-ZJ-7080); 青海省卫生计生系统指导性计划课题(2018-wjzdx-07)

Changes of thrombelastography in surgical and medical patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage

Hao Wang1, Xiaoqin Liu1, Zongzhao He1, Qiang Chen1, Bin Sun1(), Zhengping Yang1, Siqing Ma1   

  1. 1. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Qinghai Province People's Hospital, Xining 810007, China
  • Received:2020-03-30 Published:2021-05-28
  • Corresponding author: Bin Sun
引用本文:

王皓, 刘晓琴, 何宗钊, 陈强, 孙斌, 杨正平, 马四清. 血栓弹力图在高血压脑出血手术与非手术患者中的改变[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2021, 07(02): 132-136.

Hao Wang, Xiaoqin Liu, Zongzhao He, Qiang Chen, Bin Sun, Zhengping Yang, Siqing Ma. Changes of thrombelastography in surgical and medical patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2021, 07(02): 132-136.

目的

观察血栓弹力图在高血压脑出血手术与非手术治疗患者中的改变。

方法

回顾性收集我院2016年5月至2018年6月间收治的高血压脑出血患者131例。根据是否手术分为手术组与非手术组,并选取门诊体检的17例健康志愿者作为正常对照组。非手术组与手术组患者治疗前后均检测血栓弹力图,正常对照组只做当日体检时的血栓弹力图。比较三者血栓弹力图指标的差异。

结果

治疗前3组间两两组间比较,治疗后手术组与正常对照组、手术组与非手术组组间比较,治疗前后手术组与非手术组组内比较,凝血反应时间(R)、血凝块形成时间(K)、血细胞凝集块形成速率(a角)、最大血块强度(MA)、凝血指数(CI)差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后非手术组与正常对照组组间R、MA分别比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。入院时的出血量与CI、CI与手术治疗患者的总出血量均呈负相关(r=-0.618,P=0.001;r=-0.666,P=0.001)。入院时出血量与CI值、入院时CI值与手术治疗患者的总出血量、入院时出血量与治疗后CI值均呈负相关(r=-0.618,P=0.001;r=-0.666,P=0.001;r=-0.697,P=0.001);手术治疗患者的总出血量与治疗后CI值无相关关系(r=-0.038,P=0.760)。

结论

高血压脑出血患者的凝血因子,凝血块形成的速度,纤维蛋白水平及血小板功能均发生异常。患者经手术或非手术治疗后存活患者的上述指标较入院时好转,但手术组的血栓弹力图指标较非手术组明显异常,这可能与手术组患者脑出血量多,病情严重有关。

Objective

To understand the changes of thrombelastography in surgical and medical patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.

Methods

The clinical data of 131 hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage patients were retrospectively collected in our hospital from May 2016 to June 2018. Patients were divided into the surgical group and medical group according to whether received operation or not. Seventeen healthy volunteers who underwent physical check-ups were selected as the control group. All the patients were tested by thrombelastography before and after treatment. The control group was only tested once when underwent physical check-ups. The results of thrombelastography in the three group were compared.

Results

Before treatment, R value, K value, a angle, MA value and CI value were significantly different among three groups as well as different in each two group comparisons (P<0.05). Similar results were found after treatment except K value, a angle, CI value between non-surgical group and normal control group. Significant differences of the R value, K value, a angle, MA value and CI value were found between before and after treatment in both surgical and medical group (P<0.05). There was a negative correlation between the blood loss and the CI at admission (r=-0.618, P=0.001), the CI at admission and total blood loss in patients undergoing surgical treatment (r=-0.666, P=0.001), the blood loss at admission and post-treatment CI (r=-0.697, P=0.001). Total bleeding in patients undergoing surgical treatment had no association with post-treatment CI (r=-0.038, P=0.760).

Conclusion

Patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage had abnormal clotting factors, clot formation rate, fibrin and platelet function. The indicators of both surgical and medical patients improved after treatment.

表1 ICH评分量表
表2 3组高血压脑出血患者一般资料比较
表3 不同组别间TEG各指标及其治疗前后的比较
1
Chan S, Hemphill JC. Critical care management of intracerebral hemorrhage [J]. Crit Care Clin, 2014, 30(4): 699-717.
2
Whiting D, DiNardo JA. TEG and ROTEM: technology and clinical applications [J]. Am J Hematol, 2014, 89(2): 228-32.
3
武子霞, 刘志永, 张伟, 等. 血栓弹力图预测SICU患者抗凝治疗的风险 [J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2018, 30(7): 658-661.
4
中华医学会神经病学分会, 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国脑出血诊治指南(2019) [J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2019, 52(12): 994-1005.
5
Othman M, Kaur H. Thromboelastography (TEG) [J]. Methods Mol Biol, 2017, 1646: 533-543.
6
Liu Z, Chai E, Chen H, et al. Comparison of thrombelastography (TEG) in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage and cerebral infarction [J]. Med Sci Monit, 2018, 24: 6466-6471.
7
Kawano-Castillo J, Ward E, Elliott A, et al. Thrombelastography detects possible coagulation disturbance in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage with hematoma enlargement [J]. Stroke, 2014, 45(3): 683-688.
8
张丽娜, 蒋渊, 艾宇航. 重症神经系统疾病患者救治:保护为先 [J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2020, 6(3): 241-243.
9
陈勇, 方怀志, 陈道文, 等. 急性脑血管病患者血栓弹力图指标改变的临床意义 [J]. 临床神经病学杂志, 2017, 30(5): 366-368.
10
Yu Y, Wu J, Zhao W, et al. Calibrated automated thrombography for monitoring coagulation function in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage [J]. J Int Med Res, 2015, 43(3): 316-325.
[1] 靳茜雅, 黄晓松, 谭诚, 蒋琴, 侯昉, 李瑶悦, 徐冰, 贾红慧, 刘文英. 产前他克莫司治疗对先天性膈疝大鼠病理模型肺血管重构的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 428-436.
[2] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[3] 张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 613-618.
[4] 许语阳, 吕云福, 王葆春. 乙肝后肝硬化门静脉高压症脾肿大外科治疗进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 469-473.
[5] 赫嵘, 贾哲, 张珂, 李代京, 张萌, 蒋力. 基于PSM分析腹腔镜肝切除联合Hassab术治疗合并门静脉高压症肝癌疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 376-383.
[6] 邹勇, 顾应江, 丁昊, 杨呈浩, 陈岷辉, 蔡昱. 基于Nrf2/HO-1及NF-κB信号通路探讨葛根素对大鼠脑出血后早期炎症反应及氧化应激反应的影响[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 271-277.
[7] 运陌, 李茂芳, 王浩, 刘东远. 微创穿刺引流联合吡拉西坦、乌拉地尔治疗基底节区高血压性脑出血的临床研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 278-285.
[8] 刘政委, 仪立志, 尹夕龙, 孔文龙, 纠智松, 张文源. 锥颅血肿外引流与神经内镜手术治疗老年基底节区高血压性脑出血的疗效分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 299-303.
[9] 陈显金, 吴芹芹, 何长春, 张庆华. 利用多模态医学数据和机器学习构建脑出血预后预测模型的研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 193-198.
[10] 许秀兰, 朱建建. 血压变异性与伴H型高血压的急性脑梗死患者预后不良的临床关系分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 199-204.
[11] 谭可, 李锦平, 彭玉涛, 吴文汧, 杨子文, 汪阳, 陶立波, 刘畅. 机器人辅助立体定向血肿引流术治疗自发性脑出血疗效及卫生经济学评价[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 205-214.
[12] 韦维, 李忠华, 黄礼德. 机器人辅助第四脑室血肿穿刺抽吸外引流术[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 255-256.
[13] 丁晶, 李培雯, 许迎春. 醒脑开窍针刺法在神经急重症中的应用[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 161-164.
[14] 张许平, 刘佳成, 张舸, 杜艳姣, 李韶, 商丹丹, 王浩, 李艳, 段智慧. CYP2C19基因多态性联合血栓弹力图指导大动脉粥样硬化型非致残性缺血性脑血管事件患者抗血小板治疗的效果[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 477-481.
[15] 赵暾, 徐霁华, 何有娣, 鲁明. 误诊为脑梗死且险些溶栓的急性自发微量脑出血一例[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 369-372.
阅读次数
全文


摘要