切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

第五届中国出版政府奖音像电子网络出版物奖提名奖

中国科技核心期刊

中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊

中华重症医学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (04) : 402 -405. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-1537.2023.04.011

综述

贝叶斯分析在重症临床研究中的应用进展
陈含冰, 邱海波()   
  1. 210009 南京,江苏省重症医学重点实验室 东南大学附属中大医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-08 出版日期:2023-11-28
  • 通信作者: 邱海波
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重点项目(81930058); 江苏省重症医学重点实验室项目(BM2020004)

Application of Bayesian analysis in critical care clinical research

Hanbing Chen, Haibo Qiu()   

  1. Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China
  • Received:2022-08-08 Published:2023-11-28
  • Corresponding author: Haibo Qiu
引用本文:

陈含冰, 邱海波. 贝叶斯分析在重症临床研究中的应用进展[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 402-405.

Hanbing Chen, Haibo Qiu. Application of Bayesian analysis in critical care clinical research[J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2023, 09(04): 402-405.

循证医学时代的到来使得重症临床随机对照研究(RCT)的作用日益显著,然而RCT面临诸多问题与挑战,尤其是近来几项被寄予厚望的大型重症临床RCT出现了阴性结果,却表现出了明显的临床差异,这引发了广泛的争论,而随后的贝叶斯再分析均发现相应的治疗措施确有明显的积极作用。这凸显了贝叶斯分析在重症临床研究中的重要作用。本文就贝叶斯分析在重症临床研究中的应用作一综述。

The arrival of the era of evidence-based medicine makes critical care clinical randomized controlled trial (RCT) increase significantly, but RCT faces many problems and challenges, especially when recent several large clinical RCT appeared negative results with obvious clinical differences, causing a wide debate. The subsequent Bayesian reanalysis found that the corresponding treatment measures had obvious positive effect. This highlights the important role of Bayesian analysis in critical care clinical research. This review focuses on the application of Bayesian analysis in critical care clinical research.

1
Cavalcanti AB, Suzumura ÉA, Laranjeira LN, et al. Effect of lung recruitment and titrated positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) vs low PEEP on mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial [J]. JAMA, 2017, 318(14): 1335-1345.
2
Combes A, Hajage D, Capellier G, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome [J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 378(21): 1965-1975.
3
Hardin CC, Hibbert K. ECMO for severe ARDS [J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 378(21): 2032-2034.
4
Harrington D, Drazen JM. Learning from a trial stopped by a Data and Safety Monitoring Board [J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 378(21): 2031-2032.
5
Shanholtz C, Reed RM, Brower RG. ECMO for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome [J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 379(11): 1090.
6
Patel BV, Barrett NA, Vuylsteke A. ECMO for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome [J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 379(11): 1090-1091.
7
Muñoz J, Keough EA, Visedo LC. ECMO for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome [J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 379(11): 1091.
8
Bartlett RH. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: EOLIA and beyond [J]. Crit Care Med, 2019, 47(1): 114-117.
9
Hernández G, Ospina-Tascón GA, Damiani LP, et al. Effect of a resuscitation strategy targeting peripheral perfusion status vs serum lactate levels on 28-day mortality among patients with septic shock: the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK randomized clinical trial [J]. JAMA, 2019, 321(7): 654-664.
10
Munch MW, Myatra SN, Vijayaraghavan BKT, et al. Effect of 12 mg vs 6 mg of Dexamethasone on the number of days alive without life support in adults with COVID-19 and severe hypoxemia: the COVID STEROID 2 randomized trial [J]. JAMA, 2021, 326(18): 1807-1817.
11
Greenland S, Senn SJ, Rothman KJ, et al. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations [J]. Eur J Epidemiol, 2016, 31(4): 337-350.
12
Goligher EC, Tomlinson G, Hajage D, et al. extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and posterior probability of mortality benefit in a post Hoc Bayesian analysis of a randomized clinical trial [J]. JAMA, 2018, 320(21): 2251-2259.
13
Zampieri FG, Damiani LP, Bakker J, et al. Effects of a resuscitation strategy targeting peripheral perfusion status versus serum lactate levels among patients with septic shock. A Bayesian reanalysis of the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial [J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2020, 201(4): 423-429.
14
Granholm A, Munch MW, Myatra SN, et al. Dexamethasone 12 mg versus 6 mg for patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxaemia: a pre-planned, secondary Bayesian analysis of the COVID STEROID 2 trial [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2022, 48(1): 45-55.
15
Yarnell CJ, Abrams D, Baldwin MR, et al. Clinical trials in critical care: can a Bayesian approach enhance clinical and scientific decision making? [J]. Lancet Respir Med, 2021, 9(2): 207-216.
[1] 杨薇, 郝霞, 朱冬振, 张劲柏, 田雪飞, 姚斌. 中医药治疗烧烫伤患者临床效果的荟萃分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 419-426.
[2] 王海燕, 张冬雪, 粟申平, 姜彤. 光动力联合龈下喷砂疗法对种植体周围炎龈沟液菌群分布改变的疗效[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 391-403.
[3] 江文诗, 何湘湘. 全球及我国器官捐献发展特征分析与学科建设[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 280-286.
[4] 龚泽众, 朱万骥, 任延英, 徐朝辉, 曲慧, Hyok Ju Ri, 张帆, 邵帅, 陈鑫. 预防性放置补片对预防造口旁疝疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 96-104.
[5] 薛小军, 锜和强, 屈振南, 钟伟, 李冉冉, 陈宇凡, 周松. 儿童腹股沟疝腹腔镜与开放手术效果与安全性的Meta分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 587-594.
[6] 郭亮, 王彦, 徐瑜, 白莉, 徐智. 课程思政教育融入呼吸与危重症医学专科医师规范化培训[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 299-300.
[7] 中华医学会重症医学分会. 中国成人ICU患者营养评估与监测临床实践指南[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 321-348.
[8] 徐静媛, 谢波, 邱海波, 杨毅. 《重症医学》课程思政建设的探索与实践[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 265-268.
[9] 崔妍, 谢克亮. 重症医学教学中融入思政与人文教育的思考与实践[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 205-209.
[10] 刁世童, 王伊帆, 董润, 彭劲民, 何淑华, 翁利, 杜斌. eSOFA,qSOFA,SIRS对于脓毒症患者预后预测价值的比较:一项基于非ICU住院患者的前瞻性队列研究[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 143-148.
[11] 刘帅, 徐珊珊, 王淑雅, 侯梦雪, 苗明月, 田莹, 张琳琳, 周建新. 成人重症患者镇痛镇静诊疗流程[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 135-142.
[12] 胡小芸, 姜利, 杜斌. 重症医学医师的毕业后教育—中国医师协会重症医学医师分会住培与专培工作[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2022, 08(02): 101-102.
[13] 李琪, 黄钟莹, 袁平, 关振鹏. 基于某三级医院的ICU多重耐药菌医院感染影响因素的分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 777-782.
[14] 童译庆, 张建明, 贺星星, 傅一牧, 赵刚, 封启明. 基于贝叶斯网络模型在脓毒症患者血小板减少症发生因素中的分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(11): 1120-1125.
[15] 王朝安, 许军峰, 贺军. 安慰针临床随机对照试验研究现状[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2022, 11(04): 162-164.
阅读次数
全文


摘要