Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition) ›› 2024, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (01): 25-30. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-1537.2024.01.004

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles    

Cluster analysis of PiCCO parameters in patients with sepsis combined with low cardiac function index

Jie Hu1, Guolong Cai2,()   

  1. 1. Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 313012, China;Department of Critical Care Medicine, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou 313000, China
    2. Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 313012, China;Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou 313012, China
  • Received:2023-07-31 Online:2024-02-28 Published:2024-04-01
  • Contact: Guolong Cai

Abstract:

Objective

To identify different phenotypes and screen the prognostic phenotypes by cluster analysis of pulse-indicated continuous cardiac output monitoring technique (PiCCO) parameters in septic patients combined with low cardiac function.

Methods

Seventy-eight septic patients with low cardiac function index and PiCCO recordings were screened in the US Intensive Care Database (MIMIC Ⅳ 2.0) (2008-2019). Based on the PiCCO parameters (Cardiac Function Index CI, Whole Heart End-Diastolic Volume Index GEDI, Systemic Vascular Resistance Index SVRI, Extravascular Lung Water Index (ELWI) K-mean clustering characterized patients into different phenotypes. The inter-phenotypic parameters were compared in different phenotypes, such as CI, GEDI, SVRI, ELWI, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), age, gender, body mass index (BMI), sequential organ failure score (SOFA), history of previous illness, in-hospital mortality for the primary clinical outcome, and incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI grade 3) for the secondary clinical outcome, difference in the length of hospital and ICU stay. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were established.

Results

Four different phenotypes were identified in this study. Phenotype 1: hypervolemic, high vascular resistance, very high extravascular lung water. Phenotype 2: normal blood volume, normal vascular resistance, normal extravascular lung water. Phenotype 3: normal blood volume, high vascular resistance, high extravascular lung water. Phenotype 4: high blood volume, normal vascular resistance, very high extravascular lung water. Phenotype 1 had the worst prognosis and the highest in-hospital mortality rate (66.7%). The difference of in-hospital mortality among the four phenotypes was statistically significant different (χ2=7.8, P=0.045). Multifactorial logistic regression showed, compared to phenotype 1, phenotype 2, phenotype 3, and phenotype 4 had an OR and 95%CI of 0.095 (0.017-0.540), 0.087 (0.013-0.580) and 0.067 (0.006-0.719), with significant differences (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Cluster analysis based on PiCCO parameters confirmed different phenotypes of haemodynamic status in patients with sepsis combined with low cardiac function index and identified critically ill patients based on the phenotypes, thus predicting the prognosis of patients.

Key words: Sepsis, Low cardiac function index, Pulse index continuous cardiac output, Cluster analysis, Phenotype, In-hospital mortality

京ICP 备07035254号-19
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322627 E-mail: ccm@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd