Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (01): 77-85. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-1537.2020.026

Special Issue:

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Implementation of fluid resuscitation according to aortic velocity time integral variability in severe septic patients

Qian Zhang1, Zhenjie Hu1, Lixia Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medicine University, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
  • Received:2018-03-18 Online:2020-02-28 Published:2020-02-28
  • Contact: Lixia Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Lixia, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the role of aortic velocity time integral variability (△VTI) in severe septic patients for fluid resuscitation.

Methods

This is a prospective, randomized controlled, intreventional study. Severe septic patients in the intensive care unit of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from March 2015 to January 2016 were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups according to the randomized controlled principles: ultrasound-guided group and routine care group. For the patients in the ultrasound-guided group, we used ultrasound to detect aortic velocity time integral variability after fluid challenge (within 5 minutes of the infusion of 300 ml compound sodium chloride) and then determined whether to start fluid resuscitation; if △VTI≥15%, it meant these patients had fluid responsiveness, then they would be intravenously infused with 500 ml compound sodium chloride injection within 30 minutes. This pattern of ultrasound-guided resuscitation would be repeated until the accomplishment of EGDT. If △VTI <15%, it meant patients hadn′t fluid responsiveness, they would not be given fluid resuscitation. For the patients in the routine care group, the clinicians determined their therapeutic regimen. The physiological and laboratory variables, amount of fluid resuscitation, achievement rate of EGDT, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, length of mechanical ventilation, length of vasopressor requirement, amount of vasopressor, 7-days mortality and 28-days mortality were collected.

Result

We enrolled 70 patients and randomly divided them into two groups according to the randomized controlled principles: ultrasound-guided group (n=37) and routine care group (n=33). We finally completed the ultrasound guide group (n=34) and routine care group (n=29). The amount of fluid intake and fluid positive balance within 0-6 h in the ultrasound guide group increased significantly compared with the routine care group (P<0.05). The amount of fluid balance within 0-7 days in the ultrasound guide group was significantly less than that of usual care group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in fluid intake, fluid discharge and fluid balance in 0-6 h, 0-12 h, 0-24, 0-72 h, 0-5 days. There were no significant differences between the two groups (P=0.129), but the ultrasound-guided group had higher achievement rate of EGDT(except CVP) than the usual care group (76.5 vs. 58.6%) .There were no significant differences between the two groups in length of hospital stay. Length of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay was significantly reduced in the ultrasound-guided group compared with the routine care group (P<0.05). The amount of vasopressor in the ultrasound-guided group was significantly less than that of routine care group, and the length of vasopressor requirement was significantly reduced in the ultrasound-guided group compared with the routine care group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the 7-day mortality and the 28-day mortality.

Conclusion

The aortic velocity time integral variability can be used to evaluate the volume responsiveness in severe sepsis patients and guide fluid resuscitation. It is more precise in terms of fluid management than the routine care, and it can reduce the amount of vasopressor, shorten length of vasopressor requirement and mechanical ventilation.

Key words: Aortic velocity time integral variability, Severe septic, Fluid resuscitation, Fluid challenge, Fluid responsiveness

京ICP 备07035254号-19
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322627 E-mail: ccm@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd