切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

第五届中国出版政府奖音像电子网络出版物奖提名奖

中国科技核心期刊

中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊

中华重症医学电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (02) : 159 -163. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-1537.2021.02.012

综述

舒张压对脓毒性休克进展预测价值及治疗指导的研究进展
高志伟1, 谢剑锋2, 刘玲2, 陈辉2, 李聪2, 杨毅2,()   
  1. 1. 210000 南京,江苏省重症医学重点实验室 东南大学附属中大医院重症医学科;223300 江苏淮安,南京医科大学附属淮安第一医院急诊医学科
    2. 210000 南京,江苏省重症医学重点实验室 东南大学附属中大医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-07 出版日期:2021-05-28
  • 通信作者: 杨毅
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(81971888); 江苏省社会发展专项(BE2018743); 江苏省医学重点人才项目(ZDRCA2016082); 江苏省淮安市卫生健康科研立项项目(HAWJ201905)

Clinical research progress of diastolic blood pressure in predicting the progression and guiding the treatment of septic shock

Zhiwei Gao1, Jianfeng Xie2, Ling Liu2, Hui Chen2, Cong Li2, Yi Yang2,()   

  1. 1. Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine Southeast University, Nanjing 210000,China; Department of Emergency, the Affiliated Huaian NO.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huai'an 223300, China
    2. Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine Southeast University, Nanjing 210000,China
  • Received:2021-02-07 Published:2021-05-28
  • Corresponding author: Yi Yang
引用本文:

高志伟, 谢剑锋, 刘玲, 陈辉, 李聪, 杨毅. 舒张压对脓毒性休克进展预测价值及治疗指导的研究进展[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2021, 07(02): 159-163.

Zhiwei Gao, Jianfeng Xie, Ling Liu, Hui Chen, Cong Li, Yi Yang. Clinical research progress of diastolic blood pressure in predicting the progression and guiding the treatment of septic shock[J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2021, 07(02): 159-163.

部分脓毒性休克患者即使按照拯救脓毒症运动指南进行积极的液体复苏,平均动脉压达标(≥65 mmHg,1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)时仍存在较低的舒张压。而舒张压作为反映血管张力及左心室灌注压力指标,舒张压的降低与病情严重程度及预后密切相关。本文通过查阅相关研究,从脓毒性休克舒张压降低的病理生理机制、舒张压对脓毒性休克发生发展、器官功能障碍和预后的预测价值以及指导早期血管活性药物使用等方面进行综述,以期为重症医师救治脓毒性休克患者提供更多的参考。

Even if patients with septic shock were actively resuscitated in accordance with the guidelines of the surviving sepsis campaign bundle, some patients still had low diastolic blood pressure with a mean arterial pressure ≥65 mmHg. As an indicator of vascular tension and left ventricular perfusion pressure, diastolic blood pressure reduction is closely related to the disease severity and prognosis of septic shock patients. In this manuscript, we reviewed the pathophysiological mechanism of blood pressure reduction in septic shock, the predictive value of diastolic blood pressure on the occurrence and development of septic shock, organ dysfunction and prognosis, as well as the guidance for the early use of vasopressor, providing more information for ICU physicians in management of septic shock.

图1 脓毒症导致的低血压或乳酸≥4 mmol/L的初步复苏流程
1
Shankar-Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML, et al. Developing a new definition and assessing new clinical criteria for septic shock: for the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) [J]. JAMA, 2016, 315(8): 775-787.
2
Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study [J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10219): 200-211.
3
Xie J, Wang H, Kang Y, et al. The epidemiology of sepsis in Chinese ICUs: A national cross-sectional survey [J]. Crit Care Med, 2020, 48(3): e209-e218.
4
Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A. The surviving sepsis campaign bundle: 2018 update [J]. Crit Care Med, 2018, 46(6): 997-1000.
5
Ospina-Tascon GA, Teboul JL, Hernandez G, et al. Diastolic shock index and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock [J]. Ann Intensive Care, 2020, 10(1): 41.
6
Hamzaoui O, Teboul JL. Importance of diastolic arterial pressure in septic shock: PRO [J]. J Crit Care, 2019, 51: 238-240.
7
Dhainaut JF, Huyghebaert MF, Monsallier JF, et al. Coronary hemodynamics and myocardial metabolism of lactate, free fatty acids, glucose, and ketones in patients with septic shock [J]. Circulation, 1987, 75(3): 533-541.
8
Vidal-Petiot E, Greenlaw N, Ford I, et al. Relationships between components of blood pressure and cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease and hypertension [J]. Hypertension, 2018, 71(1): 168-176.
9
Landry DW, Oliver JA. The pathogenesis of vasodilatory shock [J]. N Engl J Med, 2001, 345(8): 588-595.
10
Siegel JH, Greenspan M, Del Guercio LR. Abnormal vascular tone, defective oxygen transport and myocardial failure in human septic shock [J]. Ann Surg, 1967, 165(4): 504-517.
11
Nakae H, Endo S, Inada K, et al. Relationship between thromboxane B2 and 6-keto-prostaglandin F1 alpha in sepsis [J]. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol, 1994, 83(3): 297-302.
12
Young JD. The heart and circulation in severe sepsis [J]. Br J Anaesth, 2004, 93(1): 114-120.
13
Wanecek M, Weitzberg E, Rudehill A, et al. The endothelin system in septic and endotoxin shock [J]. Eur J Pharmacol, 2000, 407(1-2): 1-15.
14
Lee YI, Smith RL, Gartshteyn Y, et al. Predictors of acute hemodynamic decompensation in early sepsis: An observational study [J]. J Clin Med Res, 2016, 8(8): 575-581.
15
Benchekroune S, Karpati PC, Berton C, et al. Diastolic arterial blood pressure: a reliable early predictor of survival in human septic shock [J]. J Trauma, 2008, 64(5): 1188-1195.
16
Barton C, Chettipally U, Zhou Y, et al. Evaluation of a machine learning algorithm for up to 48-hour advance prediction of sepsis using six vital signs [J]. Comput Biol Med, 2019, 109: 79-84.
17
Faisal M, Richardson D, Scally AJ, et al. Computer-aided national early warning score to predict the risk of sepsis following emergency medical admission to hospital: a model development and external validation study [J]. CMAJ, 2019, 191(14): E382-E389.
18
Holder AL, Gupta N, Lulaj E, et al. Predictors of early progression to severe sepsis or shock among emergency department patients with nonsevere sepsis [J]. Int J Emerg Med, 2016, 9(1): 10.
19
Sato R, Luthe SK, Nasu M. Blood pressure and acute kidney injury [J]. Crit Care, 2017, 21(1): 28.
20
Legrand M, Dupuis C, Simon C, et al. Association between systemic hemodynamics and septic acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a retrospective observational study [J]. Crit Care, 2013, 17(6): R278.
21
Deep A, Sagar H, Goonasekera C, et al. Evolution of acute kidney injury and its association with systemic hemodynamics in children with fluid-refractory septic shock [J]. Crit Care Med, 2018, 46(7): e677-e683.
22
Cunnion RE, Schaer GL, Parker MM, et al. The coronary circulation in human septic shock [J]. Circulation, 1986, 73(4): 637-644.
23
Ikonomidis I, Makavos G, Nikitas N, et al. Coronary flow reserve is associated with tissue ischemia and is an additive predictor of intensive care unit mortality to traditional risk scores in septic shock [J]. Int J Cardiol, 2014, 172(1): 103-108.
24
Song MJ, Lee SH, Leem AY, et al. Predictors and outcomes of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy in critically ill patients [J]. Acute Crit Care, 2020, 35(2): 67-76.
25
Ehrman RR, Sullivan AN, Favot MJ, et al. Pathophysiology, echocardiographic evaluation, biomarker findings, and prognostic implications of septic cardiomyopathy: a review of the literature [J]. Crit Care, 2018, 22(1): 112.
26
Lv X, Wang H. Pathophysiology of sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction [J]. Mil Med Res, 2016, 3: 30.
27
Khan NA, Rabkin SW, Zhao Y, et al. Effect of lowering diastolic pressure in patients with and without cardiovascular disease: analysis of the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) [J]. Hypertension, 2018, 71(5): 840-847.
28
Bamoulid J, Philippot H, Kazory A, et al. Acute kidney injury in non-critical care setting: elaboration and validation of an in-hospital death prognosis score [J]. BMC Nephrol, 2019, 20(1): 419.
29
Simon AC, Safar ME, Levenson JA, et al. An evaluation of large arteries compliance in man [J]. Am J Physiol, 1979, 237(5): H550-554.
30
Hernandez G, Ospina-Tascon GA, Damiani LP, et al. Effect of a resuscitation strategy targeting peripheral perfusion status vs serum lactate levels on 28-day mortality among patients with septic shock: the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK randomized clinical trial [J]. JAMA, 2019, 321(7): 654-664.
31
Hamzaoui O, Scheeren TWL, Teboul JL. Norepinephrine in septic shock: when and how much? [J]. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2017, 23(4): 342-347.
32
Permpikul C, Tongyoo S, Viarasilpa T, et al. Early use of norepinephrine in septic shock resuscitation (CENSER). A randomized trial [J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2019, 199(9): 1097-1105.
33
Li Y, Li H, Zhang D. Timing of norepinephrine initiation in patients with septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Crit Care, 2020, 24(1): 488.
34
Scheeren TWL, Bakker J, De Backer D, et al. Current use of vasopressors in septic shock [J]. Ann Intensive Care, 2019, 9(1): 20.
35
Cinel I, Kasapoglu US, Gul F, et al. The initial resuscitation of septic shock [J]. J Crit Care, 2020, 57: 108-117.
36
Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Runge I, et al. Tracking hypotension and dynamic changes in arterial blood pressure with brachial cuff measurements [J]. Anesth Analg, 2009, 109(2): 494-501.
37
Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2014, 40(12): 1795-1815.
38
Asfar P, Meziani F, Hamel JF, et al. High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock [J]. N Engl J Med, 2014, 370(17): 1583-1593.
[1] 作者. 脓毒症与脓毒性休克[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 0-.
[2] 龚利缘, 应利君, 吕铁, 李川吉. 平均动脉压对不同乳酸清除率脓毒性休克患者预后的影响[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(01): 37-42.
[3] 林乐清, 曹伟, 唐泽文, 王白永, 王磊, 张宁, 唐文学. 脓毒性休克患者液体复苏时外周灌注指数的临床指导价值研究[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 460-465.
[4] 中华医学会烧伤外科学分会小儿烧伤学组. 儿童烧伤早期休克液体复苏专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 371-376.
[5] 王凌峰, 李全, 曹胜军, 周彪. 我国大面积烧伤救治工作的回顾与展望[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(05): 369-378.
[6] 刘锐, 王树明. 丙戊酸钠抗休克作用及其相关机制的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(04): 359-362.
[7] 唐芹芳, 孙明忠, 傅庆萍, 肖丽华, 颜冬梅, 王颖, 季宏建. 糖尿病患者索氏梭菌感染致中毒性休克综合征一例[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 354-358.
[8] 龚茂迪, 李涛, 陈伟, 徐述雄. 一例长期口服糖皮质激素患者在经皮肾镜碎石取石术后反复发热的管理经验[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 284-287.
[9] 康慧方, 孙莉, 田应选, 尚文丽, 刘凌华, 霍树芬. HSP90α在老年恶性胸腔积液中的诊断意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 257-259.
[10] 方可, 笪欢欢, 汪君, 孙瑞祥, 王涛, 李阳, 江海娇, 鲁卫华. ECMO联合肾上腺切除救治妊娠期嗜铬细胞瘤并儿茶酚胺心肌病一例并文献回顾[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 304-310.
[11] 崔广清, 葛玲玉. PiCCO指导心功能不全合并脓毒症休克患者精准救治的效果[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 185-190.
[12] 蔡荇, 张文娟, 於江泉, 郑瑞强. 血浆肝素结合蛋白在脓毒症早期诊断和预后预测中的应用[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 168-177.
[13] 周洋, 曹学, 赵飞, 郑波, 查惠娟, 蒋娜, 罗俊, 熊伟. 血清miR-22、HSPB1水平与急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者预后的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 243-248.
[14] 孔祥增, 李艳敏, 孟莉, 刘娜, 邱会卿, 王晓. S100β、缺血修饰白蛋白、热休克蛋白70在脑小血管病认知功能损害中的表达及相关性研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 58-62.
[15] 王瑶, 杨艳敏. 伴大量心包积液及可逆性左心室流出道梗阻的应激性心肌病一例[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 50-53.
阅读次数
全文


摘要