Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (04): 339-346. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-1537.2021.04.010

• Critical Care Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis : The effectiveness of airway pressure release ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

Ying Zhang1, Weigang Yue1,(), Youfei Jiang1, Peng Yuan1, Ruiyuan Yin1, Xin Feng1, Zhigang Zhang1, Jinhui Tian2, Bin Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
    2. Evidence Based Medicine Center of Lanzhou University, Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Clinical Transformation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2020-04-29 Online:2021-11-28 Published:2022-01-29
  • Contact: Weigang Yue

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of airway pressure release ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Methods

We searched the US National Library of Medicine PubMed database, Web of Science, Cochrane Library Database, China Knowledge Network, China Biomedical Literature Database, VIP and Wanfang Database for randomized controlled clinical trials published before December 31, 2019 on the efficacy of APRV in patients with ARDS, in which the control groups used conventional mechanical ventilation, and the experimental groups used airway pressure release ventilation; outcomes included hospital mortality, ICU hospitalization time, lung compliance, oxygenation index, and mean airway pressures. The quality of the selected literature was evaluated by two professionally trained evidence-based medicine researchers.Meta-analysis was performed on the literature that met the quality criteria. The sequential analysis method was used to evaluate the sample size of the hospitalized mortality rate of ARDS patients treated with APRV.

Results

Eight articles were selected and 461 patients were enrolled, with 232 in the APRV group and 229 in the CV group. The results showed that APRV can reduce the mortality of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (OR=0.63, 95% CI=0.40~0.97, P=0.04). The TSA results show that in order to avoid the occurrence of false positive results further research is needed, the clinical sample size should be expanded to verify the reliability of the results; APRV can shorten the ICU stay of ARDS patients (OR=-4.14, 95%CI=-6.81~-1.47, P=0.002); APRV can improve Pulmonary compliance in patients with ARDS (MD=5.12, 95%CI=0.33~9.91, P=0.04); but there was no difference in improving oxygenation and mean airway pressure between the two groups.

Conclusion

APRV can decrease the mortality of ARDS patients, shorten their ICU stay, and improve their lung compliance. There is not any difference in improving oxygenation and mean airway pressure between the two groups.

Key words: Airway pressure release ventilation, Traditional mechanical ventilation, Acute respiratory distress syndrome

京ICP 备07035254号-19
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322627 E-mail: ccm@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd